Vote on the actual site, not here.

A productive member of society does the following things, works, pays taxes, contributes to the economy, obeys the laws, and attempts to improve things for the general good of society,
One could definitely state that the act of running for elected office is an ultimate contribution to society or at least an attempt of such.

Now we come to crimes of moral turpitude. Anyone that commits a crime of moral turpitude is required to be free from offenses of turpitude for a period of ten years prior to holding certain business licenses, office, and many other positions. We can call this the testing phase.

After the testing phase we enter the phase of the product release. At this point the product is made available to the general public to select or refuse at their own discretion. This is where the REHABILITATED person has passed the tests and now can prove their value to the society.

If we do not allow the REHABILITATED person who has served their time and passed the tests to serve society then we arguably have chosen to call the rehabilitative nature of incarceration a farce. And by calling the rehabilitation a farce you destroy the principle reason given for incarceration and probation as has been ruled by the Courts and introduced to law.

Respectfully, I think you get turned away from legal representation because you’ve not been able to clearly articulate what you are talking about. You keep suggesting that your case is the smoking gun that can take down the registry, that you have an order from NJ that says your registration status should be non-public, and that Florida refuses acknowledge the validity of the foreign order.

But your belief is incorrect for a number of reasons, which several people have tried to explain to you. First, every state has their own registry with it’s own rules and restrictions. That’s why Florida’s is lifetime and another state’s might be 10 years. It’s why Florida’s contains residency restrictions and another state’s does not. Some states have tiers and only publish higher tiers, whereas Florida publishes everyone. If you become subject to registration in Florida, you are put on the public registry. Period. In NJ all qualifying offenders must register with law enforcement, but only certain offenders are placed on the public internet registry. Tier 1 is not listed on the public internet registry in NJ. But that has nothing to do with Florida.

Second, you think that the FDLE is obligated to abide by the order from a New Jersey Court. The Full Faith and Credit Clause of the United States Constitution (Article IV, Section 1) has an important exception that you are ignoring. The Full Faith and Credit Clause only applies if the original court (New Jersey) had proper jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter (your placement on the Florida registry). Since a New Jersey Court does not have subject matter jurisdiction over the Florida registry (or personal jurisdiction over the FDLE), the order you have is toilet paper in this state. I’m sorry, but this is Constitutional Law 101 stuff.

You’ve criticized attorneys and organization by name and implication many times and we continue to give you the respect of publishing your comments and trying to provide you with reasons you get turned away from legal representation. Believe me, I so wish you had something valid to “explode this nationally” or your AKA (Megans Law John Doe Ex Post Facto) commanded more authority than a name you decide to post as online, but many legal professionals have considered everything you’ve posted and submitted and the consensus is that you don’t seem to get it.

— So, Miguel’s so dumb he wants to bar Registered Persons even from the Registration office?

Sure this guy’s not one your pols, FlorDUH? This sounds like something Lauren Book would push.

If no one can see what you’re exposing, and no one will offer you legal representation, why do you suppose that is?

Also, I think you may be misconstruing the origin and meaning of the slogan, “no taxation without representation.”