Hi James, have you moved forward in class action lawsuit?

after reading this I have just asked my lawyer to get a copy of the signed agreement with craigslist. my son was found guilty but has not yet been sentenced so there may still be time….

When was this added to the training manual? I was entrapped in 2007. Was in an adult chatroom on Yahoo (you had to sign in twice to cover Yahoos ass to show you were an adult). While in chatroom I was instant messaged by a person in the room. They made first contact. We chatted off and on for 3 months. Towards the end of the 3 month period she started telling me she was 15 and wanted to meet. Now we met in an adult chat room and I thought she was playing around cause I told told her I was seeing a 19 year old. On the day I was supposed to meet her I left work paid some bills and went home. 2 weeks later I was arrested at my house charged with 5 counts of using a computer to solicit and 4 counts of using a computers webcam. Wasn’t charged with even attempt. So if the rule in this manual is correct the officers violated it by instant messaging me from an adult chat room.

How can I find this training manual?

Exactly and this practice of stacking charges is illegal and violates due process. If a plea was signed as the result of charge stacking that plea is null and void because it was involuntary as the result of illegal charges to force the plea.

I am currently trying to organize a class action lawsuit against the Department of Justice for violations of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act among others like fraud and wire fraud. These operations are governed by Operational and Investigative Standards and other protocols but are deliberately being ignored by police and the DOJ to make money by framing men as child predators. One of these protocols, or mandates if you will, is that LE are not supposed to use adult websites which they have always done and didn’t admit it until recently. Basically, the cause of action is that LE and the DOJ Nationwide are the ones actually breaking the law and pinning it on innocent men. We need to get plaintiffs like yourself together and others that have recently been arrested but not illegally convicted yet.

1.) LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS SHALL NOT USE AND ARE PROHIBITED FROM USING ONLINE DATING WEBSITES FOR CONSENTING ADULTS.

2.) LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS SHALL NOT USE AND ARE PROHIBITED FROM USING ONLINE INSTANT MESSAGING CHAT ROOMS FOR CONSENTING ADULTS.

3.) LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS SHALL NOT USE AND ARE PROHIBITED FROM USING ADULT PROFILES OF THE AGE OF 18 YEARS OLD AND OLDER ON ONLINE SOCIAL MEDIA/SOCIAL NETWORKING WEBSITES.

4.) LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS ARE ALLOWED TO USE AND SHALL ONLY USE PROFILES OF THE AGE OF 17 YEARS OLD AND YOUNGER ON ONLINE SOCIAL MEDIA/SOCIAL NETWORKING WEBSITES.

5.) LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS WHEN SETTING UP AN ONLINE INTERNET UNDERCOVER STING OPERATION ARE MANDATED TO ASK FOR PERMISSION IN WRITING VIA A COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT TO SAID SOCIAL MEDIA/SOCIAL NETWORKING WEBSITE’S LEGAL COUNSEL/LEGAL TEAM FOR THE EXPRESS PURPOSE OF CONDUCTING SAID ONLINE INTERNET UNDERCOVER STING OPERATION AND IF NOT DONE SO THEY WOULD BE IN VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL COMPUTER FRAUD AND ABUSE ACT.

SOURCE: OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.

Try this on for size they initiated contact with me not once not twice but four times I never reached out to them

I know what you mean. I was in a yahoo adult chat room in 2007. Yahoo had you sign in twice to state legally than you were an adult and to covet their ass. I told my public defender about it and that it was entrapment. I even have the chats archived showing I was approached first by them, they sent the first instant message not me. I was one of the first people in the state of Florida to be arrested at home rather than a meeting place because I quit communications.

Now if we could got convictions based on law enforcement using adult websites for entrapment purposes thrown out too. Seems ironic that the government wants victims to be able to successfully sue sites like craigslist or backpage so they take away the sites first amendment protection but they are the one’s adding to the problem by violating the sites terms of service . sorta like going into a liquor store and offering to sell a patron drugs