Comments on: Reminder that fake images are illegal

By: Saddles

Saddles — Tue, 28 Jan 2025 05:08:49 +0000

From fake images to pretending situations all to catch a predator to vigilantism now robot induced internet sting operations. Whats the question? So who’s naked or do many sleep with their clothes on. Seems like all of this is counter productive and an opportunity to trap others into all this registry scheme. So whats a guy doing transporting sexual material on a cruise ship?
Maybe the advocates can figure that one out or should we just adopt a bill and send it to senators, congressmen or others that have some pull. I’m sure much of the American people don’t even understand how these sex sting operations work or could the average American care. Just get em off the street. Legal or non legal. So where’s true justice today.

By: TS

TS — Mon, 27 Jan 2025 12:00:58 +0000

In reply to Pariah.001. And a kicker is the cruise line got called out in the article. Suppose they will be cancelled now?

By: Pariah.001

Pariah.001 — Sun, 26 Jan 2025 21:27:20 +0000

In reply to TS. I know. I was suprised to see he was on there. And look what he did. Total moron man. I have paid endlessly for others crimes. Eveytime some genius does something like this things get a litte more difficult in Fl it seems.

By: TS

TS — Sun, 26 Jan 2025 17:58:04 +0000

Note from the article the PSA link posted by J. Edgar’s old office…

Child Sexual Abuse Material Created by Generative AI and Similar Online Tools is Illegal (PSA from a certain three letter alphabet soup bureau, Mar 2024, https://www.ic3.gov/PSA/2024/PSA240329)

The states are catching up with the Feds. Also, note the middle paragraph about teens creating this same matter of their classmates using this technology. Only when teens are charged and punished the same as adults will teens understand the seriousness of their actions, if they are allowed to claim they understand and know what they are doing of course. If they are not smart enough to know what sexual intercourse is when under 18, then how can they know what AI generated CSAM is? (Sarc and barb towards those adults who defend minors to the hilt.)

At the same time, note the people given as examples…people in positions of trust…

By: TS

TS — Sun, 26 Jan 2025 17:54:47 +0000

In reply to Pariah.001. Many already do ban PFRs.

By: Pariah.001

Pariah.001 — Sun, 26 Jan 2025 11:03:39 +0000

The worst part about this is now that cruise line will ban registrants. Iv always wanted to take a cruise. And haven’t been able to. The crime in it’s self isn’t the worst because there’s no real victim. If it’s fake imagines then there is no crime or victim IMO.

By: RET. SGT. Vito

RET. SGT. Vito — Sat, 25 Jan 2025 17:26:03 +0000

@JZ thanks for the link.

Nothing surprises me anymore: I knew this was coming when they made “child size” silicone dolls unlawful to possess.

It’s like the ominous ‘they’ need to start inventing new ways to keep feeding the Registry Machine.

Today happens to be my birthday and also 10 years on the registry. I am blessed to have people that know me, appreciate me and understand that the registry is a blundering headless failure. Often it comes up in scenario-based conversation such as:

“Wow, you could have killed a man, done your time and not have been watched with such scrutiny as you are with of these registry laws.”

My only retort after 10 years of the PFR lifestyle is:
Either (A) make every crime have an obsessive compulsory Registry or (B) Abolish the S.O. Registry altogether.

By: JZ

JZ — Sat, 25 Jan 2025 02:48:58 +0000

And just like that, HB 233 filed today by Rayner (Hillsborough-Pinellas):

https://flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2025/233/BillText/Filed/PDF

By: FActsShouldMatter

FActsShouldMatter — Fri, 24 Jan 2025 15:38:18 +0000

This will just bring about renewed scrutiny about banning everyone with the label from being admitted on a cruise-liner. Way to go media! Well done! Good work! Marvelous job! /s