“The contact states the offender does reside at the above address but is not home. This was verified by observing the offender’s sleep area, clothing, personal items, mail, etc. Yes No”

WHAT THE FCK ARE THESE PEOPLE DOING…SNOOPING INTO YOUR WINDOWS….THEY CANNOT PER CANIGLIA V. STROM

WILL

CANIGLIA V. STROM

GOOGLE IT

IF YOUR OFF STATE SANCTIONED PROBATION, PAROLE, ETC…THEY CANNOT STEP FOOT ON YOUR PROPERTY..

..THEY CANNOT SPY IN YOUR BUSHES AND LOOK IN YOUR WINDOWS…

EVERYONE SHOULD SAVE THEIR MONIES AND ERECT A FENCE AROUND THEIR ‘CASTLE’

ALSO, ADOPT A DOG TO BE YOUR SURVEILLANCE!

https://cops.usdoj.gov/RIC/Publications/cops-w0623-pub.pdf

EVERYONE…PLEASE SEE ATTACHED FORM

PLEASE READ THE WHOLE THING…

LOOK AT SOME OF THE ‘THINGS’ ON THE ‘LONG FORM’

THIS IS CRAZY! ‘READ BETWEEN THE LINES’

THE LONG FORM MUST BE CHANGED PER THE US Supreme Court ORDER IN….. CANIGLIA V. STROM
-that will take a law suit!

MEDIA..

Thank You…BUT, SINCE US MARSHALS ARE NOW ON THE COMPLIANCE CHECKS, THE US MARSHALS ARE PART OF THE FEDERAL SYSTEM; SINCE THEY ARE PART OF THE FEDERAL SYSTEM, THERE HAS TO BE SOME FEDERAL SORNA STATUTORY CODE THAT MANDATES COMPLIANCE CHECKS..

I HAVE ASKED MANY ATTORNEYS, AND THEY WANT NEARLY $15K TO ‘EXAM THE SITUATION’…WELL FCK THE $15K

THIS SHOULD BE A TOPIC OF FAC IMPORTANCE AS IT AFFECTS US ALL TO DISCUSS AND EXPLORE…

WHAT IS THE CODIFIED STATUTORY CODE NUMBER THAT MANDATES COMPLIANCE CHECKS?!?!?

Florida Action Committee is not a legal firm and cannot give legal advice. Good question, though.

Read what “Sex Offender Registration and Monitoring Triennial Review –2018”, which is researched and written by the Florida Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability (OPPAGA), says under “Address Verification” on page 10.

https://oppaga.fl.gov/Documents/Reports/18-08.pdf

PFRs in general are way, way, way too accepting of such “checks”. Personally, I don’t think any PFR should ever allow law enforcement criminals (LECs) or any other big government employees to get near them or their families. I especially don’t think they should ever speak to them or allow them onto their property.

What would the media do if the PR stunt ended up being nothing more than LECs pulling up to locked gates over and over and over again? Would that make for good TV? I don’t think so. It would also show the general public exactly how PFRs must protect themselves from big government harassment and the other general harassment of the Oppression Lists (OLs). When these PR stunts are conducted, no PFR should ever be seen.

I know from decades of personal experience that there a lot of benefits to keeping LECs away from your home (and businesses). If the LECs need to “verify” something, let them take their problem up with the scumbags who think the OLs are acceptable. Let them talk to neighbors or whatever. Waste their time, not mine. They waste enough of my time.

The OLs are war.

“If it save one child” is not even a good lie. Could that be more obvious? The Oppression Lists (OLs) clearly have harmed millions of children. Registry Aholes/Supporters/Terrorists (RASTs) couldn’t care less. It is more important for RASTs to get their jollies and feel smug than it is to protect innocent children. I have yet to see a PFR family where the children were not bullied, harassed, or worse, by RASTs. In fact, I would be very, very surprised if there are any children in a PFR family that are not bullied and harassed. That is a feature of the OLs. The liars will say it is just another “unintended consequence”. Nah, it was entirely foreseeable and predicted.

Does anyone know? What is the procedure?

I can’t find any verbiage that requires compliance checks!

thanks

WRONG!