Comments on: RETRACTION: Article from earlier today on MO Supreme Court Decision

By: Senator Lauren Book Spreads Lies and Hate

Senator Lauren Book Spreads Lies and Hate — Fri, 20 Sep 2019 02:23:53 +0000

If it’s too good to be true then it probably isn’t.

I have given up on any progress in this area. The constitution is worthless to these evil humans who think that they are better than everyone else.

Clearly nothing is going to change and I don’t care about steps forward. There are too many backward…we are not making progress we are losing ground all the time and it’s only getting worse.

By: JZ

JZ — Wed, 18 Sep 2019 13:29:31 +0000

In reply to JJJJ. Another annoying problem I have found is that even when you search for something one year old or less, if the author has makes an insignificant correction or a reader has posted a new comment, the search engine will bring up that article again, no matter how old the original.

By: Florida Action Committee

Florida Action Committee — Tue, 17 Sep 2019 17:33:57 +0000

In reply to Cherokee Jack. They migrated to a new content system and everything old refreshed.

By: Cherokee Jack

Cherokee Jack — Tue, 17 Sep 2019 16:43:21 +0000

In reply to Florida Action Committee. Yeah it was weird the article said it was posted 4 hours ago ( when I looked yesterday ) but the article was dated 2013. I found it on the University of Missouri's Public radio website and wonder what prompted them to re-post it.

By: Florida Action Committee

Florida Action Committee — Tue, 17 Sep 2019 16:10:52 +0000

In reply to Cherokee Jack. Correct - but the ruling was a long time ago.

By: Cherokee Jack

Cherokee Jack — Tue, 17 Sep 2019 02:32:41 +0000

But here is the original article and they did in fact rule that the registry could not be retroactive for those convicted before the registry went into effect in Missouri and still think that can be used as case law comparison here
https://www.kbia.org/post/court-rules-sex-offender-law-not-retroactive
“The court did rule, however, that anyone convicted before the law took effect in January 1995 does not have to register. “

By: JJJJ

JJJJ — Mon, 16 Sep 2019 18:54:22 +0000

I never can understand why websites don’t always include the dateline of a post – especially trusted news sources!

I often find myself reading an article from a newspaper or technical website, only to get halfway down the page and read that “…President Obama fully agrees…”

And, It’s so easy to include a script that will date-stamp all content.

By: Michael Pierce

Michael Pierce — Mon, 16 Sep 2019 18:26:38 +0000

Accidents happen.
Thank you for being on top of it.