Comments on: SB 540: We now know what the “soliciting prostitution registry” will look like.

By: Rome

Rome — Mon, 25 Mar 2019 17:52:57 +0000

What if we get legislators to propose registeries for drunk drivers? Give Book a call and offer the idea for such a list. We could use her own arguments (except the arguments on drunk drivers are backed up by research). We’d say, great job. Now we want a “public database” on high-recidivist drunks.

Maybe reverse psychology would work? Except it’s not reverse psychology. It’s truth.

By: obvious answers

obvious answers — Fri, 22 Mar 2019 13:10:04 +0000

how much you want to bet NONE of the congress criminals that have been blowing that 21 million tax payer bucks to pay for and cover their sex crimes will ever be on that list…its easy to create horrible laws when they wont ever apply to you.. must be nice to be one of those ivory tower dwellers looking down on the peasantry… i think I can hear them saying: “Let them eat cake”…

By: Warg

Warg — Thu, 21 Mar 2019 23:02:36 +0000

It will morph into lifetime, watch. I predict this will be an out of control witch hunt for law enforcement. Don’t go to a club and ask a girl out.

By: Riff Raff

Riff Raff — Thu, 21 Mar 2019 22:23:38 +0000

In reply to Florida Action Committee.

“soliciting prostitution registry” I wonder what restrictions those on this registry will endure. I can think of a few,, No driving on main st. night or day. No computer access. Not permitted in night clubs.
Can not reside 2500 feet from main st. or any road where prostitute’s gather. Some may be grandfathered in but will have to sleep in the woods or under a bridge. Can not get a message anywhere even in their own home by anyone even family members. Parks will be off limits at night. They mightn’t even be on curfews,, man it’s getting confusing. Think I am kidding? With the nit wit’s in charge now a days?

By: Joe123

Joe123 — Thu, 21 Mar 2019 22:06:51 +0000

This is strictly a public shaming list thought up by clearly Puritans.

You have nothing better to do than making a publicly accessible shaming list of people engaging in mutually agreed upon sex acts?

Jesus, we REALLY need a law that severely punishes lawmakers for STUPID, ASININE laws that they constantly dish out.

By: Jack

Jack — Thu, 21 Mar 2019 20:06:41 +0000

In reply to Bobby.

That was my take as well. We’ll get a couple of pimps on that registry, 2 or 3 and they would probably pass them off as ” traffickers ” and then a whole bunch of male participants (clients) caught red handed Robert Kraft style. I agree as well to expect prostitution sting operations to be more frequent than usual. It’ll be a revolving door – once a good amount of those on this registry are nearing the 5 year marker, it’s time for the system to bring in more registrants. They probably want to keep it looking filled.

By: Diesel

Diesel — Thu, 21 Mar 2019 19:25:20 +0000

And just what is this to “protect” the public from? To me it seems like just a way to shame and embarrass another human being and the way Washington is I’ll bet Congress critters will fill this list nicely

By: Ruined My Life

Ruined My Life — Thu, 21 Mar 2019 19:08:22 +0000

In reply to Sean O. Give them some time..it could be in the works..knowing their track record, they seem to want everyone on a list.

By: Ruined My Life

Ruined My Life — Thu, 21 Mar 2019 19:04:24 +0000

And why do they get to be removed after 5 years?!?

By: Bobby

Bobby — Thu, 21 Mar 2019 18:13:50 +0000

” Let’s see how many ACTUAL human traffickers wind up on this shaming list. ”

My money is on 2 or 3 in the next 10 year span – and not even. But I can bet that those in law enforcement who love initiating sex sting operations on a seasonal basis will crank up their games in prostitution stings and take advantage of this new registry to fill the numbers and receive Federal money.