I agree Captain. Well said.

It’s too bad that we have to rely on the attitude and character of a specific judge and not the law and Constitution. When two judges can refer to the same Constitution and same law and come to two different conclusions, that is disconcerting.

Yes indeed and here is another important case won in North Carolina. The ruling was made by another conservative judge. Seems like conservative judges are making the shift towards us somehow. Snyder case, Colorado case, this case in NC. it’s crazy. lol

https://narsol.org/2018/11/narsols-attorney-wins-important-procedural-due-process-case/

” the Court often bundles similar cases together in order to address the big picture all at once. ”

That was my first initial thought when I kept seeing all these cases for SCOTUS consideration – or the potential to head towards SCOTUS. What a mess this has turned out to be , lets bundle them and address the big picture. Hopefully in some way, that would be the case.

Cassandra, it’s just routine. The state’s attorney had filed a waiver to respond unless the Court requested her to do so. One of the clerks for the Supreme Court probably requested a response from her just to make the record more complete. Maybe even a dig at her for being too lazy to respond in the first place.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/18/18-386/65313/20181001134706455_Waiver.pdf
We can’t read anything into it for sure. The Court already knows the issue and the arguments for and against it. All we can do is hope that they have the courage to admit that their 2003 decision was simply incorrect on both the underlying facts and the legal principles involved. Every related petition that comes before them adds more weight for the need to act.

My sincerest apologies FAC; I forgot to add “petition ” after cert. Thus I meant “cert petition “.
Scotus did request BIO( brief in opposition) on Nov. 9th.
Just curious if anyone has any thoughts on whether Scotus asking for BIO is a good or bad thing for the case.

that seems like the perfect expost to bring down Sorna

judge states that cause they were a member of the price club first and then after being a member a new law come out where they can live is ok as they had notice prior to violating that law
it goes on to say that when they bought a home or moved into an apartment that a law was already in place

the people wearing the black dress is having the cake and eating it to!

under this ruling, nothing can ever be expost what a crock of BS these judges are really pulling at strings trying to keep these laws when they know without a doubt they are wrong
now the question to ask is why? do they make $$ off of it? family member? always follow the $$$

I will have a commentary in a few weeks on the loss of freedom of speech in my blog ‘geezerpolitics.com’

Agreed!!!