I don’t think any big registry related issues are pending before SCOTUS right now. The article, and Gundy itself, are not really about the constitutionality of registries or other sex laws.

https://www.niskanencenter.org/the-nondelegation-panic/

…because the legal issue in Gundy was not really sexual offenses or registration.

Absolutely, plus Gundy would not have benefitted many, if any, Florida registrants

https://www.inquirer.com/news/pennsylvania/spl/pennsylvania-sex-offender-registry-megans-law-challenge-supreme-court-20191205.html

It is just like here in Florida. To pass the felon rights restoration act, they had to make it more palatable by excluding sex offenders and those convicted of murder.
So what they are saying is, some people matter but not all people. Once you have messed up you are damaged goods and no 2nd chances for the outcasts, no matter how many decades it has been since your charges.

Instead we get CSI and L&O SVU “programming” teaching people the image of “violent offenders” and special “reports” about the dangerous offenders “in your backyard”. But the majority of people on the registry are there are for misdemeanor offenses, a tactic prosecutors use to get people “in the door”.

The system is more crooked than most people would care to imagine. But no one is willing to counter the momentum. Legislation is being passed all the time to preempt the courts and the judges are being left to look like the badguys for trying to help defendants. After a while they get rotated and replaced by new judges, many of them being ex-prosecutors or sheriffs trying to build their careers.

None willing to take on the sex offender problem.

This is coming from someone who’s been helping a falsely accused and convicted family member. I risked ALL to dive into the problem as do many of you out there. I fully understand that this commits me to a difficult road ahead. Sometimes I get hopeless and it just feels like fighting the wind. I gave up a promising career.

But to have done nothing is still a worse decision. Because it so easily could happen to anyone out there. The laws are already proven to be indiscriminate and the system is game to send the next defendant into their trap. And the next. And the next.

So get tough and get smart.

Very well. But when it comes to getting off the registry, I felt it’s relevant in all these topics.
I will gladly email you my findings.

Links to third party websites are not generally allowed in comments. If you want a resource added, send it to info@floridaactioncommittee.org.
The moderation of comments is a cursory process – there’s no time to review third party content for accuracy or if it is relevant to the topic.

So why was my comment not published?
I’ve noticed that not many of you, if any at all, even take part in conversing/replying to me anyway. Is there a “formula” to being involved in discussions here? SMH