Comments on: Sex Offender Approved as Class Representative in Modem Class Action Lawsuit

By: George in Texas

George in Texas — Sun, 26 Aug 2018 14:17:13 +0000

Thank you Robert, for voicing what I’ve thought for so long. Our religious leaders often sit by on the sidelines, speechless, as atrocities take place that are obviously anti-religious, anti-christian, anti whatever that one’s faith is based on.

And yet so many will throw their support behind politicians that pervert truth, honesty and justice in return for power. This could be the reason that so many are leaving their faith in droves — primarily young people who seem to see things much clearer than the older generation who seem willing to sell our nations’ soul for short-sighted gains.

By: Robert Curtis

Robert Curtis — Thu, 23 Aug 2018 23:15:19 +0000

Here is a little message in the park I gave about the Sex Offender Registry and how it is ANTI-Christian…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nK6O5-3pfKc

By: bill

bill — Thu, 23 Aug 2018 03:00:15 +0000

In reply to J.G.in AZ. it's not class

By: bill

bill — Thu, 23 Aug 2018 02:58:53 +0000

In reply to J.G.in AZ. race : a group of people who share a common past or history

By: J.G.in AZ

J.G.in AZ — Wed, 22 Aug 2018 02:39:30 +0000

This is amazing news that the court sees us as people once again

By: Crooked Rick Scott Sucks

Crooked Rick Scott Sucks — Wed, 22 Aug 2018 02:26:24 +0000

don’t know why this is even posted this is no big deal and certainly not the first time a person’s past was not allowed to be in a civil trial, and this is normal. a drunk pulled out in front of me and cause of the amount of insurance i had they found an ambulance chasing lawyer to sue me and 2 companies as i used to travel for work for 10 mil each in fed court and the ambulance chasing lawyer tried to bring that up for me and judge said jury will hear nothing about my background

By: Nicholas Maietta

Nicholas Maietta — Tue, 21 Aug 2018 21:12:58 +0000

If a parent is fighting for custody of his or her child, simply being a registered sex offender by itself is not enough to deny custody. This was established many years ago somewhere, yet today we still see this kind of argument on unrelated situations.

I have yet to see anyone convicted of a misdemeanor for refusing an application for employment or housing based on sex offender status in some States, including the State of California. The Housing Urban Development, known as H.U.D. clearly states on their applications that sex offenders need not apply. This is FEDERAL dollars that pay for housing and opening discrimination and violating State laws is not acceptable, but it is acceptable because it is never punishable.

By: John

John — Tue, 21 Aug 2018 20:52:42 +0000

“only where the representative’s credibility is questioned on issues directly relevant to the litigation or there are confirmed examples of dishonesty, such as a criminal conviction for fraud.”

Or even perjury, but a sexual offense ?? Nice try ! lol

By: It's 2018 so get over it already!

It's 2018 so get over it already! — Tue, 21 Aug 2018 20:52:10 +0000

Why is this news? Why should it matter if this person was a “sex offender”?

Really at this point it’s like saying that even though the individual was black or gay they were “allowed” to join a class action suit…unbelievable!

By: Alex

Alex — Tue, 21 Aug 2018 20:48:24 +0000

That’s right, his status has nothing! to do with any of this. Well said by the Northern District.