A BUNCH OF SICK FCKS WHO PRODUCE THAT TV GARBAGE!

REALLY SICK PEOPLE!

…WE SHALL SEE LONG THIS LASTS……I WOULD GUESS, NOT FOR LONG!

HOPE THEY HAVE A BIG WIDE REAR-VIEW MIRROR

mb

Yes and they are creating crimes that have yet to occur IE: Entrapment. Here is the worst part, even if no charges are filed, they are going show all these peoples faces, addresses and everything for the World to see so that you will have to move to the desert to be left alone.

@CherokeeJack

I also don’t have cable, but I do have multiple streaming services. However…this upcoming show sounds like smut not worthy of my eyes.

On a channel called Investigation Discovery. I do not have cable but they have been advertising the show online and on tv heavily.

This post was meant for Jacob. I guess I tapped the wrong reply button somehow.

I definitely agree with you on everything you said. Ironically I said almost the samething you are said in another post. Except my post was censored by FAC. However, my post pointed fingers a specific state reps. Which just so happened that most of those political figures belonged to a certain political party. Judging by you post, I’m gathering that you can conclude the political figures that I was referring to

I feel like I shouldn’t even have to point that out.

It’s true that government agents have distributed this material. Just as it’s true that convicted sex offenders have engaged in serial abuse and even kidnapping. But neither of those types of anecdotes are a good basis for public policy, are they?

If I’m wrong, and we have solid evidence that the government is in fact behind the child pornography problem, then there is a path to the solution: present the evidence to your elected representative, so they can launch an investigation.

Because if there’s anything legislators love to do, it’s beat up publicly on executive-branch agencies. They love to do that, AND they (as much as we) hate child pornography. As do their constituents, so this will be their chance to be a hero, attract campaign donations, and win re-election.

What would stymy a lawmaker from investigating government child pornography? The prospect of losing donations from Big Child Pornography? Don’t be silly. They would only be reluctant if they perceive that the evidence is not credible and will lead to a dead end where they look foolish. OR, perhaps such investigations have already been done, and that’s how we know about this and why we continue to blame the government.

Anyone want to take this on? Alternatively, we could just throw up our hands, declare that the government will always be behind everything bad, and give up on our public safety mission.

Good point Alan, and it is in those dark places where the real criminals are at. Aren’t those folks the ones we think about when we think of eliminating the evil of CP?

That is why I reject the “marketplace” analogy so often used by prosecutors. While commercial producers may have benefitted from some initial sale, once on the internet there is no feedback to the producer. Supply becomes essentially unlimited so there is no supply-demand dynamic. It certainly sounds nefarious for prosecutors to claim that possession contributes to the marketplace which encourages more production.

There are many good logical and moral arguments against CP, but market feedback is not one of them.

Veritas

I don’t know about ICAC, but law enforcement at all levels has been unlawfully involved in CP distribution for decades.

While in federal prison, my roommate researched the subject thoroughly. His well written 80-page report contains all of the references to federal case law (over 200 case citations) that one would need to verify the assertion that historically LE may very well be the single largest distributor of CP. It is current as of 2017 and will more than fill the citation gap you mentioned.

FAC, I scanned his report with OCR, cleaned it up in Word and made it available as a PDF if you are interested. I could supply it in Word for those who want to cut and paste from it. It would be a very informative addition to your resources section. Just let me know where to send it.

Below is the report’s abstract.

“In its zeal to arrest those who violate the sexual exploitation of minors statutes, the government has established a decades long pattern of violating those same statutes. This document discusses statutory history, how these laws apply specifically and generally to law officials, and through examination of published case law establishes the clear violation by law officials. Also covered are the Constitutional and legal issues which arise from this behavior, and the available remedies which the court can utilize to redress the official misconduct. Additionally, legal harmless investigative methods occasionally used by law officials are covered, which methods moot the need for the use of illegitimate methods. Finally, foreign commerce and Internet specific issues are discussed and the implications of the government’s use of these facilities.”

Veritas.