Comments on: SORRs could be coming to DC

By: Dustin

Dustin — Sun, 26 Oct 2025 02:12:03 +0000

In reply to obvious answers. If you would have added that convicted arsonists not be allowed to reside within 1000 feet of something flammable, you could have almost directly quoted what I have been saying for about 10 years now.

By: FAC Contributor #12

FAC Contributor #12 — Tue, 21 Oct 2025 21:25:32 +0000

In reply to Robert Curtis. She did not accuse them of re-offending.

By: Robert Curtis

Robert Curtis — Sun, 19 Oct 2025 06:19:45 +0000

Is there ANY evidence that registered sex offenders while on the registry have recently offendered in any parks or near schools. She stated that 2 were in violation. Be specific did they just violate their registration requirements or did they commit a new crime in a park or near a school? If they had committed an actual crime she would have gave colorful detail to push the fear.

By: WillForcedIsViolence

WillForcedIsViolence — Thu, 16 Oct 2025 15:54:01 +0000

In reply to obvious answers. Don’t give them any more ideas.

By: No end

No end — Thu, 16 Oct 2025 14:57:28 +0000

She talks as if every registrant makes it their life mission to move next to places where kids hang out. D*** there’s no common sense with these people!!!!

By: Tereto

Tereto — Thu, 16 Oct 2025 13:12:13 +0000

Key word, banishment!

By: obvious answers

obvious answers — Thu, 16 Oct 2025 12:31:40 +0000

if residency restrictions that just broad stroke apply to everyone of a certain designation really worked and could pass constitutional muster why aren’t they enforced for everyone? seems a no brainier here .drunk drivers and other alcohol related not allowed to live or work around alcohol establishment drug convictions not allowed around pharmacy’s, or places known to have drugs, theft charges not aloud in banks or shopping establishments that could be known to encouraging their weakness or behavior.