Comments on: Stop this new FDOC rule

By: David

David — Sun, 20 Feb 2022 04:37:35 +0000

In reply to David. So, if you are convinced and your attorney was a Public Pretender and you fired him prior to filing an appeal on your conviction then this new rule would bar your appellate counsel from contacting you??? I believe that this would rise to the level of due process violations under the Florida and United States Constitutions. Of course I am referring to the possibility that the FDOC will merely state that the appellate counsel was not representing the convicted person at the time of conviction and sentencing. I mean we are talking about the State if Floriduh here!

By: David

David — Sun, 20 Feb 2022 04:29:48 +0000

So, if you are convinced and your attorney was a Public Pretender and you fired him prior to filing an appeal on your conviction then this new rule would bar your appellate council from contacting you??? I believe that this would rise to the level of due process violations under the Florida and United States Constitutions.

By: Dr.

Dr. — Sat, 19 Feb 2022 20:28:04 +0000

Maybe someone should contact the bar association or some type of lawyer organization I’m sure a lost path of revenue would interest the organization,,,

By: Brandon

Brandon — Fri, 18 Feb 2022 13:01:56 +0000

I wonder how the Department would like it when they do wrong and can’t communicate with representation regardless if they are obtained or not. Talk about another violation of civil rights. Nice going Florida you can’t be anymore embarrassing!!

By: Heather

Heather — Fri, 18 Feb 2022 02:12:13 +0000

Maybe it qoukdnt be a good idea. A person can never have to much representation. Can they?

By: Heather

Heather — Thu, 17 Feb 2022 21:43:34 +0000

In reply to Teresa. It is a catch 22. They themselves. Make unjust laws, yet they themselves are exempt from.them? How?

By: Disgusted in Michigan

Disgusted in Michigan — Thu, 17 Feb 2022 20:40:44 +0000

I’m not a Florida resident, but I will take action as well. Its a constitutional right to be able to speak with an attorney.
These blatant violations of rights need to stop.

By: Dustin

Dustin — Thu, 17 Feb 2022 17:25:08 +0000

I’m pretty sure those are three reasons why the rule was proposed. Though they’ll never admit it, ensuring under-representation at one’s criminal proceedings is another.

By: Heather W.

Heather W. — Thu, 17 Feb 2022 16:56:31 +0000

Last time I called into conference call, a woman called in and acted like me, gave my own story as hers and planes flew way low overhead so I couldnt be heard or hear much else. If you want my comments. Come find me
Bever ave. Se. Cedar rapids iowa

By: Teresa

Teresa — Thu, 17 Feb 2022 15:11:40 +0000

Done