Understood, and well worth sharing, I just have a few caveats on this sort of thing.

If that FBI testimony is sealed, then I’m not sure how Sheryl Attkisson would be privy to it or in a position to release it.

I don’t think we have any members who had child pornography clandestinely planted on them by the government.

But if we do, or have credible evidence that this is pervasive, then we ought to gather our facts and complain to our representatives.

It would be an easy win for us. Just imagine Sen. Hawley’s office (or even our own Senator) learning from a constituent complaint that the Biden FBI was distributing child pornography. What do you think he would do with that information. He would become an absolute attack dog, and for the right reasons. Much more effective then us members complaining amongst ourselves.

It’s just a post to share, Jacob. If you watch it, you’ll see someone moderating who looks like Matt Gaetz in the hearing. That’s why I asked FAC to review.

Had an FBI agent testified that they clandestinely planted child porn on a target’s computer, that testimony would be public information. That’s how testimony works. Sheryl Attkison’s double-hearsay regarding the FBI’s ‘intent’ doesn’t really tell us much.

Most child-porn convicts accept responsibility, so this may be a fringe issue.

Meanwhile a Disney/Marvel actress and her husband have been charged with child sex crimes in the UK.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-nottinghamshire-61395856.amp