Was a joke , that is why I put a smile at the end. I was being sarcastic. Like I said, I realize they want to protect kids but so many places are banning us that it is like we are back behind bars. I got attacked by a nurse while in the emergency room because I was on the registry. Luckily I fought back. When I filed a police report, nothing was done NOTHING.

Cherokee Jack;
In another lifetime society confused sexual orientation with sexual deviancy.
Please let us not revisit that little shop of horrors.

They allowed the Village People to hang out there but we cannot? That is not fair at all 🙂

Michael A Pierce i agree with you and the way you said it .

Joeseph @ time of marriage to Mary: 90 years old.

Good thing the bible doesnt talk about him much…lol

“Sexual deviants like homosexuals and transvestites” strikes me as language so retrograde that I’m hoping it was meant facetiously!

After all, sexual offending has little to nothing to do worth deviance. It is all about perpetrating sexual harm.

It’s true that LGBTQ individuals statistically are more susceptible to sexual violence. There are also, I assume, LGBTQ individuals reading this forum who might not know what to make of language like that.

But I agree, I’m not at all surprised that their exclusion policy has resulted in no apparent change in incidents.

I’ll wager that most of us haven’t because if we don’t laugh at the absurdity of it we’ll go bonkers.

I’d be interested to see how many of those 5% are just failure to register “violations” or young lovers still in love getting back together.

Heck, I bet they consider violating probation a “sexual assault” or looking at someone sideways just because you are on the registry.

I bet the % of actual recidivism is much less.

Yes, the registry makes everything more dangerous for everyone.