Comments on: Trinidad and Tobago: Police warn against sharing sex offender registry info

By: DVC

DVC — Wed, 28 May 2025 16:24:57 +0000

It was not initially meant to be public information, but only to law enforcement, and it was not initially a criminal offense if you did not register.
That, and more has changed while they keep adding more and more restrictions like a New Year’s day parade.
That is ‘whats’ the difference?’.
They keep moving the goal post farther away from its original intent and it is producing collateral consequences far beyond its original conception.

By: Alan

Alan — Wed, 28 May 2025 15:27:08 +0000

“… commits an offence and is liable on summary conviction to a fine of twenty-five thousand dollars and to imprisonment for three years.”

I hope that is per PFR. This should be required of all US SOR’s if indeed its sole purpose is safety.

By: Bwj

Bwj — Wed, 28 May 2025 14:58:00 +0000

In reply to TS. TS That is exactly what law enforcement is saying in that country. Next Door is sharing information.

By: Robert Curtis

Robert Curtis — Wed, 28 May 2025 14:23:35 +0000

Here’s the problem…registrants can be harmed because of such a public registry by both law enforcement, politicians making laws but a common citizen can’t use such a list in a way to reach out to give them a job, education opportunity or ministry. That to me seems wrong. Can the ACLU, ACSOL or FAC file suite in that regard?

By: TS

TS — Wed, 28 May 2025 14:19:57 +0000

In reply to obvious answers. People are more likely to look at the nextdoor app, etc to see such info than they are the LE website for this info.

By: obvious answers

obvious answers — Wed, 28 May 2025 12:08:21 +0000

really if its public information whats the difference?