Comments on: Twitter and child pornography

By: Jacob

Jacob — Wed, 25 Aug 2021 14:06:55 +0000

In reply to Florida Action Committee. Child pornography content is neither liberal nor conservative (I hope). That’s the only Twitter content at issue in this case.

By: Concerned

Concerned — Wed, 25 Aug 2021 14:05:46 +0000

It’s not just Twitter. This has been going on for decades without anything being done to stop it. For example,

‘Nevermind’ Album Cover ‘Baby’ Sues Nirvana for Child Pornography https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2021/08/25/nevermind-album-cover-baby-sue-nirvana-for-child-pornography/

By: Jacob

Jacob — Wed, 25 Aug 2021 13:54:12 +0000

In reply to Florida Action Committee. Politics has no relevance to this topic. The ruling’s from a life appointee. He does not have to stand for re-election. Once in awhile my posts here don’t get published. I’m fine with that. I don’t own this platform. There are forum rules that help keep this movement focused, and they are clear, even if I occasionally forget them. If really feel strongly about a post that FAC won’t publish for me, I can just post it elsewhere. Not a problem. All FAC volunteers deserve our thanks, including those who devote their time to forum moderation.

By: Brandon

Brandon — Wed, 25 Aug 2021 13:13:10 +0000

FAC moderators shouldn’t be babysitters when it comes to comments. When having discussions on the registry, restrictions, upcoming bills, and laws it’s an emotional issue that includes history and sometimes political views. We can disagree and those disagreements shouldn’t cause fights between people. I’ve committed things that could of been seen as controversial, however that never has been my intention. It’s important to see all sides of an issue even if you disagree or if it offensive. Always remember how many people come to advocate forums see bickering and say the heck with this. That’s my two cents and you are free to disagree.

By: Capt Charles Munsey Jr. USN Ret

Capt Charles Munsey Jr. USN Ret — Wed, 25 Aug 2021 12:52:21 +0000

It’s all politics one way or another. Politics put in to place the opportunities that exist to violate the Constitution or to support the Constitution. Politics puts the judge on the bench and politics makes the laws.

By: Capt Charles Munsey Jr. USN Ret

Capt Charles Munsey Jr. USN Ret — Wed, 25 Aug 2021 12:47:52 +0000

In reply to Ed C. Please remember that politics is a major way in which people interact with each other. It is not just Republicans and Democrats. Policies, programs, and restrictions all are part of politics. The stop sign or speed limit sign is a result of some political action. If we try to exclude politics in this equation of life nothing will ever be solved. Hiding one's head in the sand will solve nothing. We still have to live with the results of political action.

By: Ed C

Ed C — Wed, 25 Aug 2021 12:41:31 +0000

In reply to Florida Action Committee. My comment was intended as irony. I wasn't really asking for censorship. Any such policy is entirely up to FAC.

By: Ed C

Ed C — Wed, 25 Aug 2021 12:37:24 +0000

In reply to KLM.

@KLM
Good job illustrating the hypocrisy and ethical breaches that exist in our criminal justice system. I didn’t research the Cosby situation and appreciate the education. Prosecutors swear to uphold the Constitution and the rule of law, but all their incentives are to win at any cost. It is not surprising that they push the ethical envelope. They are rarely reprimanded in their offices, have not just qualified immunity but absolute immunity, and judges are not even allowed visibility into the plea bargain sausage making. Given all this, they operate with absolute impunity. Nice to see them called to task in a high profile case.

Veritas.

By: Florida Action Committee

Florida Action Committee — Wed, 25 Aug 2021 12:29:15 +0000

In reply to Ed C. Just wrote about this in the weekly update. We will do a better job of screening.

By: Ed C

Ed C — Wed, 25 Aug 2021 12:13:51 +0000

In reply to Maestro.

@Maestro
Can we please keep politics out of these discussions? The subject is totally irrelevant to FAC’s purpose and could start a fight. Perhaps FAC should screen political speech (tongue in cheek).

Veritas.