I enjoy seeing the negative posts too. Good reminders of the kind of hate we are up against, usually from people who have their own sins to keep covered.

That’s fine. I respect your integrity. And in any event, to more obviously disclose who the writer going by “Really?” and by “Voice of Reason” is would be unnecessary I think. Any discerning reader has likely already figured out who the person going by those cowardly pseudonyms is.

We need to respect the anonymity of our posters. Their post was despicable, but we chose not to delete it because it gives readers more insight into the character of the person making the posts. That “go screw yourselves instead of children.” comment was very telling.

Voice – The issue in Gundy is whether the decision on retroactive application of SORNA could be designated to the Attorney general. It didn’t touch on the constitutionality of SOR statutes. Boyd hasn’t been granted cert. and it’s not clear whether it will.

We’re not bad-mouthing anyone – just presenting truthful information to our members.

Dear FAC,
I think you should have specifically identified who the writer (“Really?”) truly is in your post. And as for the “Voice of Reason” contributor, he or she apparently doesn’t know that Gundy concerns the non-delegation of authority doctrine‎, and that, in addition to the fact that Boyd HAS NOT yet been granted review in the US Supreme Court (as Estes-Hightower states in the latest email to her “Marks”), the Texas registration statute is not a “next-generation” statute. Rather, it is for all meaningful purposes the same statute that was presented in Smith v. Doe (the Alaska statute)(no residency restriction).

As for the Swearingen lawsuit, I consider Val’s complaint to be far more meritorious for a variety of reasons that ‎I’ll not expend the time to go into now. I also find it amusing that Estes-Hightower, or her local co-conspirator in Florida, wants to assign a “competitive” motivation to a non-profit organization such as FAC, which operates solely on voluntary contributions, and not on mercenary tactics unsupported by any good faith intention, to advance the rights of registrants and their family members. Finally, I think the post you refer to is not only “inappropriate,” but that it also provides additional evidence that their whole scheme was undertaken in bad faith. 

Did the poor little baby get his feelings hurt? Resorting to insults is the last refuge of the incompetent.

Nice offensive comment, You do realize we can track your IP address from your submission, right?
How do you think your clients would feel if they knew how you feel about the people you represent?

You shredded evidence.