Another fact to prove registries do not work is to compare the rates of registrants re-offending in states with strict residency requirements to those with no residency requirements. With no differences than the residency requirements only serve as punishment.

Dustin and @CJ When the Megans law was created the recidivism rate was 27% the numbers where different to use that figure. This was given out by New Jersey head of ADTC ( Modern Aushwitz ) Just think that was when there were 1172 placed on the registry. Now we are a million strong. 27% is a whole lot more today then back then. 316 vs 270,000. I don’t know for sure but it sounds more like the 316 number still. They don’t care about these numbers because you do it again in Flordaa your going away for a long long long time an will more then likely never get out.

@CJ:

I found that the best way to explain it as that recidivism rates haven’t changed since Megan’s Law was enacted. The usual response to that is disbelief, rather than a bare, unsupported remark about how the registry “works.”

That would be nice to have them as real stats for sure but I’m thinking that’s not right. Just from the news I’ve seen more then a few get toasted by entrapment’s so the.7% is pretty low.

Data is only as good as the people who enter it into the system. It is why I don’t believe in stats and or their data. The deck is so stacked against us they would never give real data stats unless it was for them.

@Phil

I personally would not be using that data because then some law maker, Sheriff or someone can twist that into saying, “See, the registry works and once we let them off, they will go right to offending”. Their logic, not mine.
Just like a border wall will not keep people from coming into the United states, putting us on a punitive registry does stop us from offending because someone who is Hell bent on doing so, is going to do so. Registries harm the registrant and their families as acts of violence or crime has been committed against us by others who wish harm on us.