<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: United States Sentencing Commission: Child Pornography: Non-Production Offenses	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://floridaactioncommittee.org/united-states-sentencing-commission-child-pornography-non-production-offenses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/united-states-sentencing-commission-child-pornography-non-production-offenses/</link>
	<description>Reforming Florida’s Sex Offender Registry Laws</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2021 00:21:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Curious		</title>
		<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/united-states-sentencing-commission-child-pornography-non-production-offenses/comment-page-1/#comment-42338</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Curious]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2021 00:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=15783#comment-42338</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What does FAC think about this?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does FAC think about this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: CherokeeJack		</title>
		<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/united-states-sentencing-commission-child-pornography-non-production-offenses/comment-page-1/#comment-42337</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CherokeeJack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2021 13:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=15783#comment-42337</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Goes back to, they can&#039;t win by telling the truth, so they lie and use a tech violation to pad the numbers and make it appear we have a higher rate than actuality. In the 30 years since my incident, I have not had so much as a parking ticket.

Law enforcement, the courts and the other side would say &quot;That is just because you haven&#039;t been caught yet&quot;. I agree, we haven&#039;t yet been caught in your web of lies and fake compliance checks where we forget to sign a piece of paper. That for sure is worth 20 or so years in prison right?

I can see the headline now &quot;Breaking News: Dangerous sex offender finally caught after 20 years&quot; ................After he/she didn&#039;t update their car tag information. The same thing with these complaince check sweeps. 
Out of 100 people they checked on, maybe 3 arrests, and of those, two were technical violations having nothing to do with a sex offense. AND they would not be a crime for anyone NOT on the registry. Punishment? I&#039;d say so.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Goes back to, they can&#8217;t win by telling the truth, so they lie and use a tech violation to pad the numbers and make it appear we have a higher rate than actuality. In the 30 years since my incident, I have not had so much as a parking ticket.</p>
<p>Law enforcement, the courts and the other side would say &#8220;That is just because you haven&#8217;t been caught yet&#8221;. I agree, we haven&#8217;t yet been caught in your web of lies and fake compliance checks where we forget to sign a piece of paper. That for sure is worth 20 or so years in prison right?</p>
<p>I can see the headline now &#8220;Breaking News: Dangerous sex offender finally caught after 20 years&#8221; &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.After he/she didn&#8217;t update their car tag information. The same thing with these complaince check sweeps.<br />
Out of 100 people they checked on, maybe 3 arrests, and of those, two were technical violations having nothing to do with a sex offense. AND they would not be a crime for anyone NOT on the registry. Punishment? I&#8217;d say so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
