Comments on: Update: Boyd v. Washington and PLN https://floridaactioncommittee.org/update-boyd-v-washington-and-pln/ Reforming Florida’s Sex Offender Registry Laws Mon, 10 Dec 2018 14:56:58 +0000 hourly 1 By: Biol57 https://floridaactioncommittee.org/update-boyd-v-washington-and-pln/comment-page-1/#comment-19513 Mon, 10 Dec 2018 14:56:58 +0000 https://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=9697#comment-19513 Sadly, Boyd was denied Cert. 🙁 https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/121018zor_f2ah.pdf

]]> By: joseph https://floridaactioncommittee.org/update-boyd-v-washington-and-pln/comment-page-1/#comment-19512 Tue, 04 Dec 2018 18:52:38 +0000 https://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=9697#comment-19512 In reply to Bobby.

@ bobby and Jz no problem guys I have fla conviction. I wish I had people like Florida Action Committee here in Az.

]]> By: JZ https://floridaactioncommittee.org/update-boyd-v-washington-and-pln/comment-page-1/#comment-19511 Tue, 04 Dec 2018 00:28:03 +0000 https://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=9697#comment-19511 In reply to joseph.

@joseph, definitely a good read. I can only hope/pray they will do their due diligence with cases that affect registered citizens.

On a side note, I have noticed that “recent comments” haven’t been showing up for several weeks now.

]]> By: Bobby https://floridaactioncommittee.org/update-boyd-v-washington-and-pln/comment-page-1/#comment-19510 Mon, 03 Dec 2018 19:11:50 +0000 https://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=9697#comment-19510 In reply to joseph.

This is pretty interesting Joseph. Thanks for the link.

]]> By: joseph https://floridaactioncommittee.org/update-boyd-v-washington-and-pln/comment-page-1/#comment-19509 Mon, 03 Dec 2018 16:45:46 +0000 https://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=9697#comment-19509 https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/supreme-court-notebook-justices-employ-signature-phrases/2018/12/03/eb525630-f6c3-11e8-8642-c9718a256cbd_story.html?utm_term=.912ceb114bd0 This is why they had a reschedule the hearing on Nov.30 this is also a good to read it helps you understand what the Judges train of thought are too.

]]> By: Bill https://floridaactioncommittee.org/update-boyd-v-washington-and-pln/comment-page-1/#comment-19508 Mon, 03 Dec 2018 16:21:26 +0000 https://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=9697#comment-19508 In reply to Jacob.

Dear Jacob,

I tried answering your question in the past. Maybe my post didn’t make it. Anyway, the losing party at the appellate level appears as the first party in a SCOTUS petition. For instance, we are all familiar with Miranda rights. SCOTUS decided that case in 1967 under the case name of Miranda v. Arizona because Mirand lost at the appellate level. Hope this helps answer your question about how to determine which party is which.

]]> By: Florida Action Committee https://floridaactioncommittee.org/update-boyd-v-washington-and-pln/comment-page-1/#comment-19507 Mon, 03 Dec 2018 15:55:23 +0000 https://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=9697#comment-19507 In reply to Jacob.

Boyd (registrant) lost in the Court of Appeals of Washington.
Prison Legal News lost in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.

]]> By: Jacob https://floridaactioncommittee.org/update-boyd-v-washington-and-pln/comment-page-1/#comment-19506 Mon, 03 Dec 2018 15:42:54 +0000 https://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=9697#comment-19506 If SCOTUS does not grant cert in these cases, then which side has won?

Yes, I know, the side that won on appeal, silly, but which side was that?

In other words, did PLN and Boyd petition for writ of cert (in which case cert is a good thing here) or did the states (in which case cert is meh thing here)?

Using dumbed-down repetition here only because I already attempted this question! Appreciate these updates.

]]>