Comments on: Updated Internet Identifier Requirement

By: fac-admin

fac-admin — Fri, 02 Dec 2016 12:07:08 +0000

In reply to Karen. Correct - our Injunction was granted.

By: Karen

Karen — Thu, 01 Dec 2016 11:29:19 +0000

My son went for his reporting date yesterday. He was required only to give unique identifiers. He was not required to give the website they were used on etc. When he asked about it he was told that the law is back to the 2014 law. (as stated in this article) He is Seminole county

By: fac-admin

fac-admin — Mon, 03 Oct 2016 13:45:31 +0000

In reply to Linda Kirkpatrick. The original definition applies to everything online. There is an online portal, or, in person at the sheriff's office.

By: Linda Kirkpatrick

Linda Kirkpatrick — Sun, 02 Oct 2016 16:29:02 +0000

Can you give me a bit more clarity on this? Is the original definition just for social media accounts? And how and who do list members report them to if they are not under supervision? Thanks….

By: fac-admin

fac-admin — Sat, 01 Oct 2016 17:07:30 +0000

In reply to jv. Keep doing what you've been doing. If you are on supervision, notify your PO of your internet identifiers.

By: jv

jv — Sat, 01 Oct 2016 13:56:52 +0000

Its Oct 1st.. WHAT DO WE DO?

By: H

Fri, 30 Sep 2016 15:17:07 +0000

In reply to MJ. I agree. I have been on probation for 2-1/2 years, and I only report my main email to my PO. My PO has never asked for any of this information, I only give it to the sheriff's office on my 6 month check in. I worry that there is so much vagueness and disagreement between the DOC and sheriff's office about what the laws actually say, and yet we are caught in the middle.

By: fac-admin

fac-admin — Thu, 29 Sep 2016 12:41:37 +0000

In reply to MJ.

There is the main challenge, which is attacking the entire Internet Identifier requirement, and the Motion for Temporary Injunction, which prevents the implementation of the new definition of “Internet identifier” (which would have you registering each URL you visited (potentially hundreds of times per day for avid web surfers or people who work online).

We won the Motion for TRO and got our injunction.

The main case continues.

By: MJ

MJ — Thu, 29 Sep 2016 01:47:44 +0000

Funny, it was never mentioned to us before that we had to report all those identifiers to our probation officers before. And I’ve been on probation for 2 years now. So if every other amendment got struck down, then why not this requirement too?? Also, it was nice to see the FDLE have to retract their original notice it sounded like they had their tail between their legs. I love it. Let’s keep going to get the whole identifier requirement banned altogether

By: Concerned

Concerned — Thu, 29 Sep 2016 01:03:36 +0000

In reply to H. H, No you do not! unless it is part of probation rules and/or court order