Comments on: US DOJ SMART Office SORNA Case Law Study 2023 revisited

By: Tim in WI

Tim in WI — Tue, 12 Dec 2023 02:52:16 +0000

It is paramount to recognize the difference between A. The people having an electronic database like SOR, versus B. Having that database + enslaving the human to the machine’s extensive maintenance. The minority in Smith V Doe ( Alaska) recognized that fact calling the regime’s intent ” unquestionably punitive in effect.” That the Rehnquist(WI) majority of the U.S.C.S. failed to acknowledge, or even weigh for that matter, all other traditional forms of punishment as described in the 13th Amendment proves the abdication of duty in the favor of big tech & social media. That is to say, In favor of purveyors of database culture extolling virtue upon the machine infrastructure.

If the very early advent of the sex offender registries says anything at all; It is that both Major Parties agreed to utilize the internet to divide the people. That is to State affirmatively, Congress is united in their intent to be divisive via the database driven infrastructure.

By: Eugene V. Debs

Eugene V. Debs — Mon, 11 Dec 2023 17:00:35 +0000

It appears that Clement has lost his case at the Supreme Court.
https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/clements-v-florida/

It was a long shot always but it would have been interesting if it would at least got a dissenting mention in the denial part with at least Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson giving us her view. Hopefully one day a court case comes up that allows us to challenge our lifetime placement on a purely punitive system that goes by a civil name.

[Moderator’s note: To clarify, the Supreme Court declined to hear the case].

My hope is that will be the Torsilieri case that hopefully comes to a conclusion soon. With us winning the lower courts in that case looks like the state has the burden there. With an appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States being Pennsylvania only remedy if we win, maybe that case will end up at the Supreme Court. All we can do is keep our heads up and keep trying to find a way to bring down this registry.

By: JJJJ

JJJJ — Mon, 11 Dec 2023 06:30:17 +0000

In reply to David. Thanks, David!! It is reassuring that we are not being dismissed out of hand; but rather, we are at least being given a chance to be heard by (some of) the judicial. I still assert (everybody), though, that we will need to (at some point) resort to civil disobedience. FED DOJ (Bureau of Justice Statistics) formal reports, farmed out to be written by SMART, continue to twist, tilt, and slant the clear evidence and research that proves SORNA has been a Failed public policy experiment! They continue to shout that the earth is flat despite the clear evidence to the contrary. [Moderated]

By: David⚜️

David⚜️ — Sun, 10 Dec 2023 19:38:54 +0000

California's lawsuit against Federal SORNA - filed and being fought by the Pacific Legal Foundation with ACSOL as a plaintiff/party - is also notable. Here's a link: https://all4consolaws.org/2023/07/ca-federal-court-denies-governments-motion-to-dismiss-sorna-claims/ The suit remains active and is slowly progressing.