Comments on: Useful Resource: Sex Offender Enactments Database

By: JoeM

JoeM — Tue, 18 Oct 2022 23:52:52 +0000

In reply to Dustin. Remeber that the Federal courts ANd the Georgia Suprme Court handed the state thi backside in like 2010. Only NEW convictions are subject to all fo the crazy restrictions. If you were convicted before say 2003, then you have pretty much no restrictions other than just having to register, at least until you get removed. The aded crazy restrictions come in in phases depending on when the laws were passed. Depending on when you were convicted, Georgia has some of the most draconian and most slack restrictions in the country. I would say that it is a very good thing that the Georgia Supreme Court has a much broader definition of what constitutes ex post facto under state law than the 11th Circuit apparently does.

By: Derek W. Logue of Oncefallen.com

Derek W. Logue of Oncefallen.com — Tue, 18 Oct 2022 14:52:47 +0000

We’re there any notable changes to FloriDUH law this year?

By: Facts shold matter

Facts shold matter — Tue, 18 Oct 2022 14:16:55 +0000

More “best practices” garbage that will just perpetuate and cement the notion that all sex offenders need to be “tracked and monitored” in hopes of “minimizing risk.”

Why are we pouring gas on this when we should be reaching for a water hose to throw cold water on the hate and lies?

By: FAC Contributor #3

FAC Contributor #3 — Mon, 17 Oct 2022 20:38:13 +0000

In reply to Dustin.

It’s 2008 – 2018 If it’s not as useful as we thought, we’ll remove it.

By: Dustin

Dustin — Mon, 17 Oct 2022 20:19:54 +0000

I think it’s a little outdated. I ran a search on Georgia and Arizona and turned up only one bill, in Arizona from 2018, since passed.

By: Jacob

Jacob — Mon, 17 Oct 2022 19:50:27 +0000

Apparently NCSL is an organization that promotes idea-sharing among state legislatures.

And as we all know, the BEST ideas for child protection come from these bodies.

By: Jacob

Jacob — Mon, 17 Oct 2022 19:24:19 +0000

The myth that there’s a ‘sex offender population’ that can be ‘managed’ by law enforcement in the interest of public safety. This type of thinking helps maximize budgets.