Megans Law’s John Doe,
You are not so vaguely alluding to a legal challenge. Would you share the details? I’m sure readers would want to know. We also want to make sure we are disseminating good information.

CJB>>

All this info is good firepower for the future so keep going we have a long hard fight ahead of us. I’m going to be hitting them at their foundation because I know where they screwed us over. I have not gone into detail reading about Smith v Doe because I know for a fact that is Alaska’s John Doe Ex Post Facto and they had trouble getting it past without Due Process. Who can top that? Megan’s Law’s John Doe Ex Post Facto out of New Jersey. Why have I not come forward, because I’ve been sitting on the public registry held on it with THREATS of punishment by law enforcement. NOW that she is gone, I had the Middlesex County New Jersey Prosecutors office called down and informed them they were not to make it public record, they were told “Our laws constitutional”. Now someone in Law Enforcement has lied to cover it up. ( I’ve been registered since the beginning where is the years 12/1998 to 2006 ) They now have placed the burden on me for a second time on the civil side of the act. The first time was unconstitutional and New Jersey got away with it. I’m not gonna let FDLE get away with it for a second time. LCSO/FDLE used my retroactive civil judgement that placed me on the registry retroactive with an actual Megans Law public notification challenge with a judges ruling of NOT FOR public notification. Yep, I can see “Double Jeopardy” proof Megan’s Law IS a punishment on people forced to register and I have Dick Zimmer and S.C. Justice David Souter’s smoking gun. I’m one of the 39 they should have NEVER made public record. Those are the 2 that should be charged for crimes against us for what they did. At least 45% of the registry is in Double Jeopardy with what they did to hide it.

RE Cherokeejack:

Bulls**t for several reasons. One, The registry *supposedly* is to notify of potential future threats, not to revisit previous ones. Two, any former victim that wants to keep tabs on their assailants can do so through the DA’s office (most states require DAs to provide it; can’t believe Florida is different). Three, a dead registrant is not going to suddenly not be dead a year or two later.

Assuming it’s true, the fact that FDLE will remove a dead registrant from its list for a (presumably substantial) fee negates any claim regarding the reason for leaving the dead on its registry.

Personally, I think FAC ought to file a civil suit regarding the dead, incarcerated, and out-of-state registrants, in that they’re not updating their entries ever year (or however often required by Florida law) and there (presumably) aren’t any warrants for them. That would severely cut into the “substantial compliance” requirement to get those grants.

Last I saw, the dead, incarcerated, and out-of state accounted for around 40k of Florida’s 70k registry population. I would argue to the SMART office that is pretty clear and obvious fraud, waste and abuse. Their feeble attempts to argue otherwise (as they certainly wouldn’t disclose the real reason – concern of a smaller budget next year if they don’t spend what they have now) would be pretty entertaining.

CherokeeJ

Once a law becomes codified in law with a statutory Number, it is so very hard to have it just disappear; the law makers mostly defy gravity-wicked!

It keeps those law makers in business as they are paid by tax payers

In all State Jurisdictions, the Only thing that a Person Forced to Register is to Sign is the garbage that is codified per their State’s Stautory Law

For ‘those’ that knock on your door without an arrest warrant signed by a Person that wears a Black Robe Costume, let them know that they are trespassing. Caniglia v Strom et.al.

Well, they are mis-representing the truth because they told me it is to allow victims to know the person died and are no longer a threat is why they keep them on the list. However, if that were the case, how come their family can “PAY” to get them removed after death? I guess if you pay, they make an exception because the FDLE gains financially from it. Just outrageous.

The point of keeping the dead (and in Florida’s case, the incarcerated and those no longer in Florida) on the registry is to increase the federal grants allotted. Those grants are based on the number of registrants, despite the ironically-named SMART office’s claims to the contrary.

Personally, I keep my registry full. Mostly to keep my behind covered but also to dilute and complicate my registry. I have about 18 emails registered, every thing that is required by the interest registered. All my families vehicles, boats, jet skis, motorcycles, campers, RVs, ATVs, trailers, even cars in my yard that have no tags/registered with DMV, all are in my registry. I have everyone on my family members and GF house as a temp address. Needless to say, they have a lot to verify. Taking up their time.

Cool. You should help them waste as much limited resources of time, money, effort, goodwill, peace, etc., as possible. Hopefully they will try to visit you 20 times a year. That is what the Registries deserve. Pure waste and stupidity.

I rarely allow the law enforcement criminals to see me at my home. If they call in advance, I might once per year. But I do love them wasting taxpayer resources trying.