<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: What the US Supreme Court Decision Means for Lifetime GPS Monitoring	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://floridaactioncommittee.org/what-the-us-supreme-court-decision-means-for-lifetime-gps-monitoring/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/what-the-us-supreme-court-decision-means-for-lifetime-gps-monitoring/</link>
	<description>Reforming Florida’s Sex Offender Registry Laws</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2015 10:59:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Karen		</title>
		<link>https://floridaactioncommittee.org/what-the-us-supreme-court-decision-means-for-lifetime-gps-monitoring/comment-page-1/#comment-1656</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2015 10:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://floridaactioncommittee.org/?p=2074#comment-1656</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So it sounds as if the decision will be whether it is reasonable or this plaintiff or for every sex offender?  It seems as if the Supreme is (reading between the lines) acknowledging that it is search and seizure and that it would NOT necessarily apply to ALL sex offenders?    FL bill states to put ALL sex offenders adjudicated after a certain date on lifetime monitoring so it seems this would automatically violate the rights of that person long before they ever commit a second crime?  Ugh ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So it sounds as if the decision will be whether it is reasonable or this plaintiff or for every sex offender?  It seems as if the Supreme is (reading between the lines) acknowledging that it is search and seizure and that it would NOT necessarily apply to ALL sex offenders?    FL bill states to put ALL sex offenders adjudicated after a certain date on lifetime monitoring so it seems this would automatically violate the rights of that person long before they ever commit a second crime?  Ugh &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
