By: Wendell

Wendell — Sun, 27 Sep 2015 03:00:39 +0000

This is proof that the offender registry is a bill of attainder,and quite un-constitutional. If, as the supreme court ruled, the registry is merely a civil obligation (not punishment), but a reasonable step to assure the safety of society at large, then DUI convictions would most certainly qualify for the same onerous, civil obligations in order to protect the community at large. if this were brought before the supreme court as an argument that the registry is a bill of attainder, they would have a hard time explaining why a group that kills hundreds of innocent men, women and children every year (DUI Offenders) are not required to notify the public via a registry, and suffer the same public humiliation that sex-offenders suffer under. Our pant-peeing politicians are quite adept at dodging their own efforts to protect their constituents are they not? It seems they have a supreme court that doesn’t mind catering to them. I find it tragic that this nation has disregarded its constitution to appease fears with a false sense of security at the expense of equality under the law.

By: Randy

Randy — Wed, 23 Sep 2015 22:07:47 +0000

The reason there is not a DUI Hit list is due to the fact that many politicians, their family and friends, lawyers, etc… would be on the list. it is Sad that the parents of little Johnny & Sally does not know that there child’s friend parents have been arrested 3 times in the last 7 years for DUI before allowing Johnny & Sally ride with there friends Kenny’s parents to the beach

Comments on: Why do DUI laws not afford the protection that sex offender laws do?

By: Wendell

By: Randy