But regarding News4Jacksonville specifically, they tend to not post comments that conflict with the narrative of one of their stories for the reason FAC posted above. They’ll only post one or two opposing points, if they can drown it in a bunch of other commentators in support.

Exactly my experience recently when trying to accomplish the same push here. The source article has the control so the only thing we can do comment until they see comments in such mass they are uncomfortable with them. The paper in NY did that last month when such comments were left by those who visit FAC forums and leave comments.

So, yes, leave comments in the vein FAC advises above but realize the source may not allow many in the end that counter their narrative, which makes it a win for PFRs if such written disobedience to their narrative is countered.

What is the cure? Personal experience is the most powerful magnifier of injustice.

Whether it is the personal experience of victims or the personal experience of an offender it is what drives sex offender laws.

These things have to change in the Judicial area. Fundamentally nothing can change unless it changes within the realm of the judiciary.

2 things must change. The 5th amendment due process clause applies to the registry and registrants have a Constitutional interest in registry laws.

And ending review of registry laws under rational basis test. The courts say a registry law doesn’t need to protect. It only needs to WANT to protect.

Without an interest in registry laws and requiring no basis of fact in a protection law, the future, as it is now is grim.

However Florida Action Committee does a great job under the circumstances. Keep up the good work….