Does the Ellingburg decision open the door to revisiting Ex Post Facto as it relates to sex offender laws?

The Supreme Court’s decision in Holsey Ellingburg v. United States (No. 24-482) should reopen a long-overdue conversation about the constitutional foundations of modern sex offender laws. In Ellingburg, the Court made clear that labels do not control constitutional analysis: when a legal consequence operates like punishment, is imposed as part of a criminal judgment, enforced through the criminal justice system,

Read more

Supervision Polygraphs – you can’t be compelled to incriminate yourself.

A recent federal court decision in United States v. McDonald, (Dist. N. Mex, January 6, 2016) delivers an important reminder to people on probation or supervised release: you do not lose your Fifth Amendment rights just because you are in sex offense treatment or required to take polygraph exams! The court upheld the general requirement that Mr. McDonald participate in

Read more

Clements’ brief filed today

Below is Louis Clements’ brief, filed today in the Middle District of Florida. Clements’ attorneys did a fantastic job of highlighting how Florida’s residency restrictions tip the scales, making registration tantamount to confinement. Special thanks to all who submitted declarations in this case and Professor Socia for his expert report on the residency restrictions in Florida. Clements Remand Brief

Read more

Michigan Supreme Court Upholds 2021 Sex Offender Registration Act AS APPLIED to one individual – It’s punishment, just not cruel and unusual punishment

The Michigan Supreme Court recently issued a decision in People of Michigan v. Robert James Kardasz, a case that once again highlights how courts across the country are grappling with the constitutional limits of modern sex-offender registration laws. While the ruling directly applies only to Michigan, its reasoning has clear implications for Florida and other states that maintain expansive, lifetime

Read more