Reforming Florida’s Sex Offender Registry Laws
On June 9, 2026, the Ohio Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in a case asks a simple but important question: What exactly is a “place of employment”? The case involves a registrant who worked for a cleaning company and was assigned to various job sites as part of his employment. Although he reported his employer, prosecutors argued that a
Read moreIn Commonwealth v. Richard Cox, the Circuit Court of Arlington County struck down Virginia’s sex-offender “loitering” statute as unconstitutionally vague, reinforcing a fundamental principle that is often forgotten when laws target registrants: constitutional protections apply to everyone. The Virginia law made it a felony for certain individuals on the sex offender registry to “loiter” within 100 feet of schools and
Read moreWeekly update for June 2, 2026. This is recording number 373 The July 1st Changes Are Coming – What You Need to Know About the New Laws Dear Members and Advocates, Next month, one of the more significant expansions of Florida’s sex offender laws in recent years will take effect. On July 1, 2026, CS/CS/CS/SB 212 (formerly HB 45) becomes law, creating new
Read moreA great decision came out of the Michigan Supreme Court last week! Gary Shaver was convicted of sex offenses as a juvenile in 2004. At that time, Michigan’s sex offender registration law (SORA) required him to report address changes within 10 days. Years later, Michigan significantly expanded SORA in 2011. The new law imposed much stricter requirements, including requiring address
Read moreSection 120.565 of Florida’s Administrative Procedure Act is one of the most important and underutilized tools available to registrants. In simple terms, it allows a person who is affected by an agency’s regulation (ie: sex offender restrictions) to ask the agency for a formal written determination about how a law, rule, or agency order applies to their specific situation. The
Read moreAttorney Janice Bellucci earned a significant win in Missouri last week, when a United States District Court Judge from the Eastern District of Missouri enjoined the Attorney General (or her Agents) from enforcing an ordinance that required registrants to display a sign that says “No Candy or Treats” on Halloween. This is a great culmination of a long fought battle
Read more