Florida Action Committee (FAC)

A Miami-Dade man was sentenced last week to one hundred (yes 100) years in prison for possession and distribution of child pornography. A press release from the Southern District of Florida can be found here: https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdfl/pr/miami-dade-county-man-sentenced-100-years-prison-child-pornography-offenses On top of the prison time he was given 25 years of probation.  

You know how humiliating they are. The monthly “address verification” visits from police. You’re years off probation and haven’t had a single brush with the law since, but still the police show up at your doorstep to “verify” that you’re living or working where you’re supposed to. If you live in a municipality with some class or discretion, they will

According to the FBI, human trafficking is believed to be the third-largest criminal activity in the world. In recent years cases have been piling up and leads are hard to follow in many instances.   President Trump has vowed to bring “full force and weight” to battle this epidemic aggressively . In a Reuters video the president pointed out the seriousness of

The Judge in the Internet Identifier case has DENIED FDLE’s request to stay the proceedings in the Internet Identifier. The FDLE had filed a motion to stay the proceedings and halt discovery in the Internet identifier case, on the grounds that the Florida Legislature had filed a bill to amend the Internet Identifier requirement and because there was a Supreme

Just published:  A new article by legal scholar Melissa Hamilton spotlights the key role of *scientific evidence* in a ground-breaking 2016 federal appeals court decision known as Doe v. Snyder—and how that holding is already impacting other challenges to draconian sex offense laws. The court’s ruling created much excitement and was heralded by the Washington Post:  Court says Michigan sex

It is now less than one week until the Supreme Court of the United States hears oral arguments in Packingham v. North Carolina. A case that will have significant impact on individual’s First Amendment rights. At issue in the case is; whether, under the court’s First Amendment precedents, a law that makes it a felony for any person on the