Men charged as teens sue to challenge Alabama’s sex offender law

Herbert Stevens met the love of his life when he was 14, and they have been together ever since — now married and with three children.

When he and Candy first started dating, his now mother-in-law was angry. Candy was only 12.  Three years into their romance, Candy’s mother reported Stevens for statutory rape when he was 17.

Regretting the decision, she later tried to get authorities to drop the charge, but it was too late. Stevens was tried as an adult, sent to juvenile boot camp and never finished high school.

Stevens is one of three men suing Alabama officials over what they say is the state’s “debilitating” sex offender registry laws. The plaintiffs, represented by the Southern Poverty Law Center, filed the lawsuit on Thursday, arguing the registry is unduly harsh and restrictive on children charged as adults.

READ MORE


Discover more from Florida Action Committee (FAC)

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

6 thoughts on “Men charged as teens sue to challenge Alabama’s sex offender law

  • September 20, 2019

    What cases are pending in the 11th circuit that will further affect Alabama? I’m an RSO residing in Alabama.

    Reply
    • September 20, 2019

      McGuire v Strange, for one.

      Reply
      • September 21, 2019

        McGuire has been pending for quite some time to the point that I almost forgot about that one. I wonder why the lengthy hold up.

        Reply
        • September 22, 2019

          It’s clear they are trying to walk on eggshells. Nobody WANTS to be the ones to write an opinion on that one.

          Reply
  • September 19, 2019

    Florida, this is our circuit! The outcome of this case will be the law here. Like all such lawsuits, the process likely will take several years.

    Florida has a reputation as being the most punitive state when it comes to former sex offenders. But Alabama’s worse.

    Reply
    • September 19, 2019

      Yes and no… Yes, Alabama is in the 11th Circuit, but a district court decision from Alabama would have to make it to the 11th circuit for it to have precedential value. That can take a long time, true. The good news is there are other Alabama district court decisions that are pending in the 11th circuit that are much closer to disposition and would be great for us, especially for homeless registrants and people who travel in-state.

      Reply

Comment Policy

  • PLEASE READ: Comments not adhering to this policy will be removed.
  • Be patient. All comments are moderated before they are published. This takes time.
  • Stay on topic. Comments and links should be relevant to this post.
  • *NEW* CLICK HERE if you have an off-topic comment or link.
  • Be respectful. Do not attack, abuse, or threaten. This includes cussing/yelling (ALL CAPS).
  • Cite. If requested, cite any bold or novel claims of fact or statistics, or your comment may be moderated.
  • *NEW* Be brief. If you have a comment of over 2,000 characters, please e-mail it to us for consideration as a member submission.
  • Reminder: Opinions and statements in comments are neither endorsed nor verified by FAC.
  • Moderation does not equal censorship. See this post for more information

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *