Reason: The Truth Could Set Them Free

In late 2006, a public defender went before a Napa County judge to argue for his client’s freedom. Rex McCurdy, a 49-year-old man, had been detained for seven years at Atascadero State Hospital under a 1995 California law authorizing “civil commitment” of people who have been convicted of sex offenses, a practice that keeps them confined long after they have completed their sentences.

In 1983, McCurdy had pleaded guilty to a rape, for which he served two years in state prison. In 1990, he was convicted of a burglary and served another six years. In 1998, McCurdy says he was brought in on a parole violation for living too close to a school, contrary to his conditions of release. Prosecutors used that violation and the two prior convictions to get McCurdy classified as a “sexually violent predator” (SVP), he says. That designation let them civilly commit him to Atascadero, much the way people with mental health issues can be locked up when they are deemed a threat to themselves or others.

Seven years after McCurdy was committed, his lawyer, Jim McEntee, was trying to persuade a judge that his client was a low risk to reoffend. If he failed, McCurdy would be confined at the hospital indefinitely. Fortunately, the lawyer had heard of evidence that might tip the scales: a study done at Atascadero itself that could help his client.

READ MORE


Discover more from Florida Action Committee (FAC)

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

6 thoughts on “Reason: The Truth Could Set Them Free

    • March 2, 2020

      Not all former governors should be civilly committed. Just Illinois governors.

      Reply
  • March 1, 2020

    I am asking everyone to carefully read this entire article, and take the time to understand all of it very carefully.
    Then save it on your local hard drive in a folder marked “evidence”.
    Then share it with as many media outlets and people as you can.
    Thanks!

    Reply
  • March 1, 2020

    Legislators don’t want truth, no matter how much evidence is produced. All they do care about is optics and re-election. Just remember: No government within these United States will EVER admit fault or apologize because it makes the government look weak.

    Reply
    • March 1, 2020

      Exactly, plausible deniability!

      Reply
    • March 2, 2020

      Unless it’s decades later with an entirely different administration like Clinton sent letters of apology to survivors of Japanese Internment Camps..

      Reply

Comment Policy

  • PLEASE READ: Comments not adhering to this policy will be removed.
  • Be patient. All comments are moderated before they are published. This takes time.
  • Stay on topic. Comments and links should be relevant to this post.
  • *NEW* CLICK HERE if you have an off-topic comment or link.
  • Be respectful. Do not attack, abuse, or threaten. This includes cussing/yelling (ALL CAPS).
  • Cite. If requested, cite any bold or novel claims of fact or statistics, or your comment may be moderated.
  • *NEW* Be brief. If you have a comment of over 2,000 characters, please e-mail it to us for consideration as a member submission.
  • Reminder: Opinions and statements in comments are neither endorsed nor verified by FAC.
  • Moderation does not equal censorship. See this post for more information

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *