MI: Man wrongly imprisoned for FTR can’t sue state

The Michigan Supreme Court has stopped a man from suing the state after he spent more than a year in prison for a crime that wasn’t a crime.

The man was behind bars for 17 months for failing to provide accurate information for Michigan’s sex offender registry. The Corrections Department then discovered that he actually wasn’t required to register.

He was sent to prison in 2014. After more than a year, a Corrections Department employee “became aware that (he) was imprisoned for a non-existent crime,” said the man’s attorney, William Goodman.

The man’s lawsuit alleged his rights were violated by a failure to properly train and supervise employees who oversee the sex offender registry. But the Michigan appeals court said there was no certainty that a person mistakenly on the list would be arrested.

SOURCE


Discover more from Florida Action Committee

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

17 thoughts on “MI: Man wrongly imprisoned for FTR can’t sue state

  • August 1, 2020

    Sheriff Chitwood has tested positive for COVID-19. He wants to thank all those who have wished him well.

    Reply
  • August 1, 2020

    According to a recent Newsweek article, The End of the Prison-Industrial Complex?, part of the problem is the judges who are elected by voters. “Research shows that to keep their jobs, judges are more likely to hand out harsher sentences as they approach Election Day. They get campaign donations from lawyers, lobbyists, and business interests who have a vested interest in keeping the system just the way it is. We call this corruption.” The article also alludes to the special interest groups: prosecutors, police unions, drug companies, and lobbyists, who have a hold on elected officials. The answer: American Anti-Corruption Act that would stop gifts from lobbyists to politicians, stop the revolving door between Congress and the prison industry, and give all adults the right to vote. Desmond Meade is an important name to remember.

    Reply
    • August 1, 2020

      Check out American Anti-Corruption Act championed by RepresentUs with Desmond Meade sitting on the board. The Anti-Corruption Act would ban gifts from lobbyists to politicians, close the revolving door between Congress and the prison industry, and enfranchise even more voters — so politicians actually represent we, the people. I have been unable to find out if Desmond Meade is now including registrants.

      Reply
      • August 1, 2020

        Do we know whether OffenderWatch, the registry contractor, donates to the campaigns of sheriffs and state legislators? If so, I would support a way to limit those and end the registry-industrial complex.

        Reply
        • August 1, 2020

          I do not know, but I would sure like to know.

          Reply
  • August 1, 2020

    As much of a total crock as this ruling is, are the judge’s and justices’ hands tied because the state’s legislators, WHOM THE PEOPLE ELECTED, chose not to provide a legislative remedy for those who are wrongfully convicted and incarcerated? This could be evidence that compensation for the wrongfully convicted and imprisoned is not a priority of most people because it hasn’t ever happened to most people. It’s sad, but we tend to be very indifferent to an issue so long as it’s someone else’s problem.

    Think about this: How many times have we decried what we consider to be cases of judicial activism and cried “LEGISLATING FROM THE BENCH!!!”. Even though it would have been in “our” favor, would it not have been legislating from the bench to provide relief when there’s no law that permits said relief? That’s the real injustice here. There’s no state law that mandates relief for those wrongfully prosecuted and imprisoned, or in this case have the debilitating stigma of wrongful listing on the state’s sex offender registry, which is undeniably the worst form of character assassination.

    Reply
    • August 1, 2020

      So true- too often we castigate judges for saying what the law is.

      And “legislating from the bench” is not even an issue. Registrants have precisely the opposite problem— they are judged by the legislature.

      Reply
  • August 1, 2020

    Goes to show this country and those who are in charge, are both garbage.

    Reply
  • July 31, 2020

    F****** unbelievable!!! 😠
    But I am sure that we Registrants are not included in this wonderful new “Reform the criminal justice system” movement! 😠😠😠

    Reply

Comment Policy

  • PLEASE READ: Comments not adhering to this policy will be removed.
  • Be patient. All comments are moderated before they are published. This takes time.
  • Stay on topic. Comments and links should be relevant to this post.
  • *NEW* CLICK HERE if you have an off-topic comment or link.
  • Be respectful. Do not attack, abuse, or threaten. This includes cussing/yelling (ALL CAPS).
  • Cite. If requested, cite any bold or novel claims of fact or statistics, or your comment may be moderated.
  • *NEW* Be brief. If you have a comment of over 2,000 characters, please e-mail it to us for consideration as a member submission.
  • Reminder: Opinions and statements in comments are neither endorsed nor verified by FAC.
  • Moderation does not equal censorship. See this post for more information

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *