ID: Case brought to challenge laws outlawing anal and oral sex.

The legal challenge involves an anonymous man who was convicted in another state under a law outlawing oral or anal sex. Lawyers for the man say he performed oral sex on his wife more than 20 years ago. In Idaho, that crime requires registration as a sex offender for life.

The ACLU of Idaho represents the man.

SOURCE


Discover more from Florida Action Committee (FAC)

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

29 thoughts on “ID: Case brought to challenge laws outlawing anal and oral sex.

  • September 25, 2020

    A sentence in the article caught my attention:

    “Being on the public sex offender registry dictates where a person can live and what jobs they can hold.”

    If only that was all it dicktates! Someone should educate this reporter, and the ACLU of Idaho, apparently, on vigilantism, shaming, discrimination against family members, etc. ad nausem.

    Reply
    • September 26, 2020

      JZ
      We need to make a thorough list of what we cannot do

      Theme parks, City and county parks, Be within a 1000 feet of a school ( or whatever each places ordinances are that no one can keep up with ). No Halloween, No going to your kids / grandkids school play, Not able to find a job, housing, being fired as a patient by your doctor ( happened to me ) having a notification on your drivers license, some with stickers on their bumpers and yard signs, being on the registry for life, not being able to to vote, not being able to travel or so restricted it is not worth it. Not allowed on most if not all social media. Having our passports marked and flagged. Not being able to date or make friends. Being a target of threats and vandalism. Having to report all of our internet sites and screen names. having cops show up at our houses even though not on probation. Getting “Special” treatment when/ if pulled over by law enforcement. Not being able to go to a shelter during a hurricane or emergency. I can go on but that should be enough to show that the registry is to help us and not harm us or act as punishment since EVERYONE else in the U.S not on the registry has to do all that stuff as well. Oh wait, no they don’t Hummmmm. Judges, gets some cojones and follow the constitution and give us back our freedoms we were supposed to be guaranteed, at the very least once we have served our sentences. What would Jesus do? Oh right, He would forgive us and not mention our past again.

      Reply
      • September 27, 2020

        CJ, your brief list alone should convince the average person that the registry is nothing but punishment and vindictiveness. Since the government can’t outright kill us, yet, they want to drive us into suicide by making our lives not worth living.

        Reply
  • September 25, 2020

    Government filling the loopholes of what Mosas ignored on the 10 commandments lmfao.

    Reply
  • September 25, 2020

    Jesus – i haven’t even had my coffee yet!! If they keep this up i’m going to have to put a Nanny filter on my computer. LOL.

    Reply

Comment Policy

  • PLEASE READ: Comments not adhering to this policy will be removed.
  • Be patient. All comments are moderated before they are published. This takes time.
  • Stay on topic. Comments and links should be relevant to this post.
  • *NEW* CLICK HERE if you have an off-topic comment or link.
  • Be respectful. Do not attack, abuse, or threaten. This includes cussing/yelling (ALL CAPS).
  • Cite. If requested, cite any bold or novel claims of fact or statistics, or your comment may be moderated.
  • *NEW* Be brief. If you have a comment of over 2,000 characters, please e-mail it to us for consideration as a member submission.
  • Reminder: Opinions and statements in comments are neither endorsed nor verified by FAC.
  • Moderation does not equal censorship. See this post for more information

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *