Jurors don’t know what the penalties for a guilty verdict will be. They should.
Our jury system asks jurors to make decisions that have enormous consequences for citizens and their family members. The tough-on-crime laws of the 1990s, which lengthened many sentences to decades in prison, were sold to Floridians as being for the worst-of-the-worst criminals. What we have found, though, is that these harsh laws have caught up many people for whom they were never intended by our citizenry.
Before making a decision, should jurors be made aware of what will happen after a guilty verdict? Being told of the full sentence could be a game changer. As our courts are now, judges can undermine jurors’ opportunity to produce a fairer punishment when legislators and courts are not willing to do so.
There are criminal statutes that are far more severe than most citizens are aware.
Being placed on the registry in Florida can be part of a sentence, making sure that the punishment continues for a lifetime. Should jurors know this? Yes! Should the punitive nature of the registry be explained to the jurors? Yes! Every minute detail of it!
The punitive nature of the registry in Florida is so severe that there are people who are taking longer prison sentences in exchange for NOT being placed on the registry. As a defense attorney told me five years ago, being placed on the registry will destroy a person’s life.
Criminal juries were intended by our founders to be powerful checks on state power over criminal punishment. If that power could be returned to jurors, legislators might think twice before enacting severe penalties.
The sex offense registry is part of the sentencing process and is punitive, and that is putting it mildly. Jurors need to know how punitive the registry is to counteract what unscrupulous and self-centered lawmakers have done.
Discover more from Florida Action Committee (FAC)
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Punishment, Penalities or even persuading endeavers, who can be right in these matters. Sure many can cry foul on biblical grounds or as many say does one size fit all in this registry game. Many didn’t have a chance to go to a jury but were given a plea deal or bargain. Should one look at a plea bargain, or deal as a bribery type of technique.
Man is always gonna have challenges and/or complications when it comes to others wanting to overthorw others such as in this registry ruse. Many citizens don’t even understand this and conclude its about raping someone but is it actually protecting with this cloud over one’s head.
One wonders if these able men and women are able to tie their shows right or is everything a plea deal away. Where is the true justice in that?
Even the mere suggestion off tepid leniency with a jurist deciding a sex case would be scoffed at and met with derision.
Asking the victimhood culture to give up ANY aspect of the registry would be like asking them to give up their God or religion. Lawmakers know fully well that hate, animosity and resentment is the accelerant that keeps the registry going. The post-conviction hell-scape for those with sex offenses puts a big smile on their faces, and in twisted way, gives them a sense of purpose.
Why would the comment section be closed on something that was just posted a day before?
Cherokee they are just going by an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth in their on self-governing way with a bit of the Old Testament and they being ordained. Don’t we all know their is a higher authority than this man-made government. One wonders if government is self-centered.
While we are on the subject, of government , don’t expect man made government to be just. Scripture explains why. 1 John 5: 19 . The one who controls all earthly governments is not the true God. The one that does control government, including this one , has never been interested in justice.
As far as the registry is concerned the US constitution was thrown out the widow when it was started. The members of the USSC at that time that voted for it decided they knew better than the writers of the constitution. And decided that they could better protect the interests of children by in acting it, in their personal opinions. They were wrong. As time has proven.
There was a football game Sunday between the KC Chiefs and Baltimore. There was about one minute left in the game. KC had possession of the ball and were within field goal range , which they could have just kicked the ball and won the game but they decided to use up more time on the clock, they would run one more play. The ball was handed to him( won’t mention his name) when he got hit he dropped the ball and Baltimore took possession, so were able to win the game.
The point is should this one mistake be a mark that would loudly identify this player and even this team forevermore.
Or should we look at the whole record and choose to overlook these indiscretions and let them go on and try to do better from now on.
Look at all the facts. Like this player had never dropped the ball before , he had been out of use for 3 week before this with COVID isolation, he had some really hard hits already in the game.
In a court all the circumstances are never taken into consideration , so to condemn someone permanently for a single indiscretion or mistake should not be what identifies us as a society. But yet that is what the registry does.
Our natural human inclination is to hold grudges which scripture calls animalistic. The Godly inclination is to forgive. What do we choose to be identified for?
David
Think that is a bad example. The reason is, that is why I do not watch sports. Some fans hold players accountable for life for any mistake they think ruined the teams chances. I would like to see those fans play one , just one game and show us all how it is done.
Yeah that is what I thought.
I was always taught to play your best and that is all you can do. There has to be a winner and a loser (Except in soccer) so whoever loses, someone is going to be disappointed.
CherokeeJack
That might be a bad example I used as a illustration but I think the lesson learned would be appropriate. Whether applied to a judge or a juror or anyone else. We never know all the circumstances in a situation so must be very careful in judgment matters. Especially when you are talking long term repercussions. Which the registry is.
David
Foot ball is a team sport and it is team against team so it is: US vs. Them.
Golf is a game of “Every man for himself” (Or herself).
So the registry is like golf, us against everyone else. And F.A.C is like football, we are a team and it is us against them (The courts and law makers).
Ok, I’m confused. I thought that the registry was a civil collateral consequence of a sex offense and not part of the sentencing process. A criminal statute must specify the punishment for a violation. A judge certainly can’t add a punishment that is not specified in the statute.
I doubt that Florida sex crime statutes are written to include a term on the registry. If so, that would actually be a good thing for any ex post facto argument, as the registry would then unambiguously be punishment.
Veritas.
Florida Statue
https://www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2018/943.0435
Thanks for the link Redkat. My point is that registration is not part of the punishment for a sex crime. It may be a crime to not register, but the original sex crime does not include registration in the punishment specified in the statute. I realize this is a fine legal point, and doesn’t change the punitive aspects of registration. However, to say that registration is part of “the sentencing process” is not quite correct.
If Florida does have a sex crime statute that lists registration as part of its punishment, I’d love that link. It would be quite useful.
Veritas.
ED C
I would like the stats on how many jobs the registry has created nationwide. I bet it is a staggering amount. Those cushy jobs are what motivates some to make sure the registries never go away. It is not about justice, it is about funding, control and suppression.
I can’t find any fault in that analysis, Cherokee. Nor would it be hyperbole to call it the “Registration Industrial Complex.”
Veritas.
ED C
When I was a cop there was no registry. However, I could imagine if there was one and they assigned me to that detail, I would have declined. Not because of what I know now, but I would have considered that baby sitting and harassing people who we already caught doing something.
I was more interested in stopping crime and apprehending those doing something wrong, not messing with people who haven’t gotten a chance to prove they can change. Even the most horrid person I came across, I never called anyone a scum bag or any derogatory name. I called even the worst of the worst “Sir” and Ma’am”. No matter how mean they were to me I remained not just professional but also kind, caring and compassionate to all people I came into contact.
I remember praying over a drug dealer as I watched him take his last breath. I got made fun of by other officers for a long time after that.
I can happily state I never got a single complaint against me when I worked in law enforcement, and that is hard to do. I never purposely put handcuffs on too tight, never “Accidently bashed someone’s head into the roof of the car as they were being placed under arrest. It was never my job to judge them or be the jury. It was not my job to deliver street justice. It was my job to arrest them and take them to jail and let the courts and the lawyers do the rest.
I use to really miss working in law enforcement. In today’s environment I wouldn’t do it if it was the last job on Earth and it paid $100,000 to start.
Cherokee, you are the embodiment of the objective of police reform. Over the years, we have seen increasing militarization of the police. I even heard one chief refer to his department as a “para-military force.” That para-military attitude does not belong on the street where there are citizens, but on the battlefield where there are enemies.
Thanks for your good service.
Veritas.
Ed
Thank you. I was born on a military base. My Dad was in Vietnam along with his two brothers. My Grand Dad served in WWII.
I tried to join the military but they said I had too many health issues. One trait I did not get from my Native blood is flat feet. I have huge high arches and cause me a lot of pain. My Mom got the flat feet I got the high heel lady feet HAHAHA
I have to regularly buy arch supports to wear shoes.
Yeah, but you’d probably look like one of Cinderella’s ugly step sisters trying squeeze into high heels! Try wearing flats instead. lol Unlike you, I was blessed with good health and the privilege of serving as an engineer officer in the 82nd Airborne Division.
Best wishes.