Member Submission: Custody, Rehabilitation, and the Burden That Remains

Custody is a term we often associate with children or legal guardianship, but it extends beyond those common uses. To be in someone’s custody means to be under their care, control, and legal responsibility. Most of us live in our own custody—we control our choices, our schedules, and our futures. But for those who are incarcerated, that custody is taken away entirely.

I know this from personal experience.

Years ago, I committed a serious offense, one for which I am deeply repentant. I accepted responsibility through a plea agreement and served 12 years in prison, followed by 3 years on stringent sex offender probation. During that time, I was under the full legal and physical custody of the State of Florida. Every aspect of my life was controlled: when I woke up, where I worked, how long I could shower, and when I could go to bed. I was counted, searched, and inspected daily. I was told where to live, how to behave, and what to do with my body. I was, in effect, a legal minor in the custody of a parental state—except with fewer rights.
Incarcerated individuals in Florida are legally required to work—without pay. For over a decade, I labored for the state with no opportunity to earn or save. So when I was released, I was handed a reloadable Visa card with $100 on it, the clothes I was wearing, and nothing else. I had no phone, no identification, no money, and no experience using the smartphones that had become essential while I was imprisoned. I had no family, no friends to greet me, and no support network. I was a man stepping out of the past into a present I did not recognize.

And yet, I rebuilt my life.

Through sheer determination and humility, I secured employment and now hold an executive position at a small corporation. I acquired a home of my own, purchased a reliable vehicle, and even acquired two rental properties that now provide me with additional income. I also completed over 13 years of professional mental health therapy and was awarded a certificate of successful completion. I fulfilled every element of my sentence—prison time, probation, financial restitution, and therapeutic requirements.

By every legal and moral standard, I have earned back the right to full personhood—to the custody of myself.
But that is not how I am treated.

Despite completing my sentence in full, I am still compelled to appear in person four times a year for what amount to forced interrogations. During these meetings, I am not afforded the right to remain silent—if I do not answer questions, I am labeled non-compliant and subject to felony prosecution. Though I live independently, work professionally, and have committed no further offenses, I remain under the state’s thumb, forced to comply or face imprisonment once again.

This is called “registration,” but let’s not pretend it is merely administrative. It is surveillance. It is coercion. It is a civil regulation that feels—and functions—as an ongoing sentence.

Some may say, “But you broke the law.” Yes, I did—and I paid for it. Fully. Repeatedly. Painfully. What I object to now is the lack of a pathway back to freedom. I object to the idea that rehabilitation is never enough, that no amount of work, remorse, or restitution can restore one’s civil liberties.

We must ask ourselves: What is the purpose of the justice system? If it is only to punish, then this extended oversight makes sense. But if it is also to correct, to rehabilitate, to restore—then surely we must acknowledge when that mission has been accomplished.

I am not asking for pity. I am asking for logic. I am asking for fairness. I am asking for a society that believes people can change—and makes room for them when they do.


Discover more from Florida Action Committee (FAC)

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

11 thoughts on “Member Submission: Custody, Rehabilitation, and the Burden That Remains

  • July 8, 2025

    Well written.

    Abolish the registry

    On another note. Epstein client list? I’m pretty sure there’s a client list. Or a friends list. The problem is there are many very important people on that list. It makes sense that they decided to say there wasn’t a list to avoid a meltdown. So if you sleep with a minor you get prison time. If you sleep with a minor and have money and power the government protects you. It justifies the abolition and repeal of the registry.

    Reply
  • July 8, 2025

    I have not heard ot said better..

    Reply

Comment Policy

  • PLEASE READ: Comments not adhering to this policy will be removed.
  • Be patient. All comments are moderated before they are published. This takes time.
  • Stay on topic. Comments and links should be relevant to this post.
  • *NEW* CLICK HERE if you have an off-topic comment or link.
  • Be respectful. Do not attack, abuse, or threaten. This includes cussing/yelling (ALL CAPS).
  • Cite. If requested, cite any bold or novel claims of fact or statistics, or your comment may be moderated.
  • *NEW* Be brief. If you have a comment of over 2,000 characters, please e-mail it to us for consideration as a member submission.
  • Reminder: Opinions and statements in comments are neither endorsed nor verified by FAC.
  • Moderation does not equal censorship. See this post for more information

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *