SC: Church Leaders Arrested After Giving Registrant a Second Chance.

A man in his 70s, convicted in 2023 of a sex offense involving a minor, was approved by his probation office to volunteer at a local church. It’s the kind of stable, supervised community connection that reentry research consistently shows reduces reoffense risk. His probation condition was that he have no direct contact with minors. Somewhere between that condition and daily reality, he ended up working as a custodian at a school the church also operates. When that came to light, it triggered a criminal investigation and now church leadership (not just the registrant) is facing felony charges alongside him, including obstruction and conspiracy counts.

Whatever the outcome of the criminal cases, the underlying problem is that probation conditions like “no direct contact with minors” are often handed down without much practical guidance on what that means. More concerning is criminal liability for third parties — employers, pastors, family members, program coordinators — because someone under supervision violated their conditions. When it comes to the registry, prosecutors are willing to charge obstruction, conspiracy, or “endangerment” counts against people who were not on probation themselves, but were just trying to help out someone who was.

In practice, that means legal risk to a third party who hires a registrant, which is a huge, huge additional barrier to finding employment. That’s a meaningful chilling effect. For employers, religious congregations, charitable organizations, and practically anyone, the safer legal move is often to keep a wide distance from anyone on the registry rather than take on a supportive role at all — which cuts directly against the reintegration outcomes the system claims to want.

That’s the reform conversation FAC keeps having. If states keep stacking barriers to housing, employment, and reintegration in front of registrants, successful reentry becomes impossible.

SOURCE