FAC Weekly Media & Policy Update
FAC MEDIA WEEKLY UPDATE
New Video Premieres • FAC v. Glass • Petition Momentum • FAC Support
Florida Action Committee continues to expand its media, public-education, research, and advocacy efforts around registry laws, enforcement, housing, constitutional questions, and the real-world experiences of affected people and families.
Watch the videos, follow the lawsuit, sign and share the petition, and support the work. You can also contact FAC Media privately to ask questions or request information without committing to public participation.
CONFIDENTIAL INQUIRIES WELCOME
Ask questions. Request information. Discuss your privacy needs before sharing your story.
Members, families, researchers, attorneys, educators, journalists, and other interested readers are welcome to contact FAC Media.
Reaching out does not obligate you to give an interview, make a public statement, donate, or become publicly involved.
You may request that the initial discussion remain private while you review the information and decide whether you want any further involvement.
Depending on the project, you may request an alias, an off-camera interview, or a background-only discussion. Any confidentiality arrangement with an outside journalist must be agreed upon separately with that journalist.
Your contact information will not be provided to a journalist or other outside party without your permission.
Please do not post personal details or sensitive documents in public comments. Contact FAC Media directly instead.
New FAC Videos Premiered Yesterday
Yesterday, FAC premiered new video content on Facebook and YouTube.
Every view matters. Views, comments, shares, and reactions on Facebook and YouTube help show how far these stories are reaching and help introduce these issues to people outside the registry community.
The Call
The Call explores the human impact of registry policy and asks what happens when legal restrictions continue beyond a person’s original sentence.
It invites discussion about families, reintegration, public safety, proportionality, and constitutional rights.
Operation Endgame: Is This Retaliation?
This FAC discussion examines a large-scale registry compliance operation and asks viewers to look closely at the distinction between new sexual-offense allegations and registration-related allegations.
It also raises questions about enforcement priorities, proportionality, taxpayer costs, and whether increased enforcement occurring alongside constitutional challenges deserves closer scrutiny.
Is this retaliation? That is a question for examination, not a statement that retaliation has been established. Timing alone does not prove motive; the evidence and circumstances must be evaluated.
FAC v. Glass
On August 11, 2026, Florida Action Committee filed its federal constitutional challenge to Florida’s registry system and related local restrictions.
The case asks whether the cumulative effect of modern registry restrictions has crossed the line from civil regulation into punishment.
UN Petition Momentum Is Growing
31 new signatures in one night!
The petition has now reached approximately 9,429 signatures.
That represents roughly 100 new signatures since FAC v. Glass was filed on August 11.
Great work to everyone who has signed, shared, and helped spread the word. Momentum matters, and every new signature brings us closer to the 10,000-signature milestone.
Approximately 571 signatures to go.
FAC Fundraising Update — 74% of Goal
FAC is approximately 74% of the way toward its current fundraising goal.
Your support helps sustain FAC’s constitutional litigation, advocacy, legal and policy research, public education, outreach, and media work.
If you are able to help, please consider making a contribution through FAC’s official donation page.
Transparency Note: Donations support Florida Action Committee’s organizational mission, including advocacy, legal, educational, research, outreach, and media activities.
Help the Information Travel
Please watch the new videos, share them, comment, and encourage others to subscribe.
Facebook and YouTube both help us see how far these stories are reaching. Every view, comment, and share helps bring these issues before researchers, journalists, policymakers, families, and members of the public.
Questions? Start a Private Conversation.
For background information, source requests, documentary questions, or a discussion about participation and privacy, contact the FAC Media Team.
WITH UNITY COMES CHANGE
Discover more from Florida Action Committee (FAC)
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
I have been inviting people in comments to come read about the facts and challenging them to look at real statistics, comparisons of recidivism rates, impact of rehabilitation and the end of sentences for other crimes compared to what we still endure post completion of our sentences. Recidivism rates are staggering for other crimes that are considered bad but are more “normalized” in society (think DUI, drug offenders/dealers, theft/burglary/robbery, which usually escalates to more severe and just as impacting to society). There are a multitude of vs statistics that we, in my opinion, should be using in these lawsuits. DUI = 34 percent recidivism rate. 34 percent!!!!! And those are the ones that got caught again and possibly AGAIN. The same exact argument that they use against PFR’s. I have recently started working on building a folder on these statistics, and obviously started with DUI stats, mainly because I have seen it personally, both the recidivism and impact, where once done with their sentence, it is a thing of the past, up until it happens again and someone(s) are injured or worse and then it is the same process again. Charged, sentenced, completed, and reintergrated with minimal impact or care.
For us, it’s immediately the “woodchipper”, banishment, or other likes of that…..