A Federal Judge Says the DOJ’s Sex Offender Registration Rules Violate Due Process by Requiring the Impossible

The U.S. Department of Justice has threatened to prosecute people for failing to register even when their state no longer requires nor allows them to do so.

According to Reason.com, “Someone who fails to meet these requirements and travels outside his state can be charged with a federal crime punishable by up to 10 years in prison.  At trial, the defendant has the burden of proving that he was unable to register as required by the federal Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA).”

A federal judge in California has ruled that this violates the constitutional right to due process.

U.S. District Judge Jesus G. Bernal wrote, the Justice Department “has done exactly what is forbidden by the Constitution: ‘to declare an individual guilty or presumptively guilty of a crime.’”  Bernal continues, saying that the Department of Justice “subverts the procedural safeguards deeply rooted in our history and constitutional framework.”

The Alliance for Constitutional Sex Offense Laws (ACSOL) joined this lawsuit.  Thank you, Janice Bellucci.

SOURCE


Discover more from Florida Action Committee

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

101 thoughts on “A Federal Judge Says the DOJ’s Sex Offender Registration Rules Violate Due Process by Requiring the Impossible

  • February 11, 2023

    FAC
    I have not received any updates or posts since Jan 31st. Is everything ok?

    Reply
    • February 1, 2023

      Logue is everywhere, I can tell by his writing style. Glad to still have you here, Derek.

      Reply
      • February 2, 2023

        That’s not me. I’m me. I think. Hard to tell these days.

        Reply
        • February 2, 2023

          Yeeeeeah. It don’t matter. I’ve wrote responses and answers to my own replies. It’s all about spreading knowledge.

          Reply
    • January 29, 2023

      For Cherokee Jack and everyone else instead of scrolling down and I put my answer here. The way to fight this is the way that nobody wants to come out of the Shadows man up be honest and hold them accountable for the same so-called Republican values of individual rights and doing your time and constitutional principles and all the rest. Don’t block intersections show up in the state house and fill the gallery fill the floor protest directly gathered together and go door to door during elections and educate the public about what they do to people and how unjust and unfair it is how low the recidivism rate is and all the rest. But all they do is yak and complain and that won’t get you anywhere

      Reply
      • January 29, 2023

        I will be coming out of the shadows as you say. This week I have meeting with authorities to bring out a very big injustice that has been done. It is why I’m trying to contact anyone who lived in Lee County during the time that Sgt. Booth ruled over us. I need to see if she told anyone else to move out of her state. Yeah, She had to get me to move because I was not to be on the public side of the registry an they did. She doesn’t know who she messed with, I’m a NJ Retroactive, B52, Tier Level 1 sex offender. It may not make sense to you but they are screaming thier laws are constitutional. Issue is you can’t enforce constitutional on people who were convicted before the laws. The State of NJ was able to place people retroactive under the civil side with “Due Process” That is the Tier Level 1 Not for public notification. 24 years because of the threats of punishing me to the fullest extent of her laws. right after she said a list of new laws of 3rd degree felonies. If I didn’t like it MOVE OUT OF MY STATE… Yep, she sure did say that. It’s not the laws we need to go after it’s these deputies who get a wild hair an then they take the authority to their heads an add punishment.

        Reply
      • January 29, 2023

        It’s not just Republican law makers, Democrats have screwed us too. They are all politicians.

        Reply
    • January 27, 2023

      I would like to know whether this councilman ever voted in favor of a sex offender ordinance.

      Reply
      • January 28, 2023

        Jacob

        That my friend, I cannot answer. I know as much as the article printed depending on how much coffee I had the day I posted this LOL

        Reply
      • January 29, 2023

        should be a public record

        Reply
    • January 28, 2023

      Check out another article linked in this one re: the “one man cyber cop.” Basic fluff piece patting the guy’s back for his ability to text like a teenage girl. I dropped a comment, but doubt it’ll be there long.

      Reply
      • January 29, 2023

        I just added a comment to your comment. I’m sure we hear from the yahoos soon.

        Reply

Comment Policy

  • PLEASE READ: Comments not adhering to this policy will be removed.
  • Be patient. All comments are moderated before they are published. This takes time.
  • Stay on topic. Comments and links should be relevant to this post.
  • *NEW* CLICK HERE if you have an off-topic comment or link.
  • Be respectful. Do not attack, abuse, or threaten. This includes cussing/yelling (ALL CAPS).
  • Cite. If requested, cite any bold or novel claims of fact or statistics, or your comment may be moderated.
  • *NEW* Be brief. If you have a comment of over 2,000 characters, please e-mail it to us for consideration as a member submission.
  • Reminder: Opinions and statements in comments are neither endorsed nor verified by FAC.
  • Moderation does not equal censorship. See this post for more information

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *