A WIN!!! Does v Swearingen (EPF I)

The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals just came out with their opinion in Does v. Swearingen (Ex Post Facto I) and IT’S A WINNER! The case is getting sent back to the District Court and the Plaintiffs will have their day in court.

I am sharing the opinion below for your reading pleasure, without having the opportunity to read through and digest it myself.

Trust that a deep dive and further celebration will come shortly!

EXTRA SPECIAL THANKS to the amazing lawyers who are litigating this case!

Does v Swearingen – 11th Circuit Opinion


Discover more from Florida Action Committee

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

61 thoughts on “A WIN!!! Does v Swearingen (EPF I)

  • October 21, 2022

    So when is the court date?

    Reply
  • October 21, 2022

    Well, this looks like good news, but I’m a tad confused. I thought that Florida action committee inquired as to the claim that you had to register a temporary residence if you left your permanent residence for more than three days? I actually thought it was three or more days and I thought that recently, FDL Lee, or perhaps the attorney general stated that you didn’t have to register if you were gone from your permanent residence more than three days unless you intended to establish a temporary residence wherever you were going. Did I miss something? did the court missed this? Should we expect a claim from the state that this issue is moot because they have already “resolved” this and the 11th circuit has made a factual error in the ruling?

    Reply
    • October 22, 2022

      Valid point. The statute says “Three or more days” the eleventh circuit opinion said “More than three days”. Legally it makes no difference because it was still a win. Effectively it’s even better because if the 11th Cir found that “More than three days” were a burden, clearly “three or more days” is even bigger a burden.

      Reply
  • October 21, 2022

    This is super as far as it goes …. But then there’s the crippling and long-awaited, and seemingly binding, McGuire decision of two weeks ago…. 🥹🥹

    Suspenseful…

    Oremus indeed.

    Reply
    • October 23, 2022

      Finally Retired

      Yes, just spent 30 minutes reading McGuire. The courts basically ruled registries are here to stay and are not punitive in nature, rather regulatory. If this becomes binding law, not telling what new horrors will be added to future “Retroactive” laws.

      Reply
      • October 23, 2022

        Yes, Cherokee Jack, all one needs to do is look at Michigan. Wait a decade to finally have the state’s sex offender registry law declared void as unconstitutional, only to have the legislature pass a brand new retroactive law. Sends states the message that they can effectively skirt any federal oversight by just rewriting the rules.

        Reply
        • October 23, 2022

          In that case, McGuire is no loss, because the legislature would have done what they wanted either way.

          Reply
  • October 21, 2022

    This is AMAZING!!! Thank you FAC most days are pretty dreary but days like this make it worth it. Once you a deep dive can let us know the scenarios that can positively effect us? I’m a layman when it comes to law. Love you guys!!

    Reply
  • October 21, 2022

    Awesome!! I will be filing a notice of judicial authority in my case. This helps me immensely as Swearingen has presented the same statute of limitations argument in his motion to dismiss my complaint. Thank You!!

    Reply
    • October 22, 2022

      notice of supplemental authority

      Reply
  • October 21, 2022

    Congrats FAC Staff, Attorneys and Volunteers!!! I know how hard you have fought for this…Godspeed…

    Reply

Comment Policy

  • PLEASE READ: Comments not adhering to this policy will be removed.
  • Be patient. All comments are moderated before they are published. This takes time.
  • Stay on topic. Comments and links should be relevant to this post.
  • *NEW* CLICK HERE if you have an off-topic comment or link.
  • Be respectful. Do not attack, abuse, or threaten. This includes cussing/yelling (ALL CAPS).
  • Cite. If requested, cite any bold or novel claims of fact or statistics, or your comment may be moderated.
  • *NEW* Be brief. If you have a comment of over 2,000 characters, please e-mail it to us for consideration as a member submission.
  • Reminder: Opinions and statements in comments are neither endorsed nor verified by FAC.
  • Moderation does not equal censorship. See this post for more information

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *