Amended Complaint in DOES 1-7 v. SWEARINGEN (Ex Post Facto PLUS Case)
An amended complaint has been filed in the “Ex Post Facto PLUS” suit. A copy of the complaint can be read from the link below.
The amendment adds a couple plaintiffs, adds Facial Challenges to the Statute, and adds complaints for violation of the plaintiffs’ rights to substantive due process and privacy under the Florida Constitution.
FAC wishes to thank, wholeheartedly, the hard work of attorney Val Jonas, Beth Weitzner, Todd Scher, Jeanne Baker and Grant Sarbinoff who have been working tirelessly on this case.
Does v Swearingen – Amended Complaint
Discover more from Florida Action Committee
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
where does the state come up with the 25-year number that there is no danger? thus = admitting as time goes on there is no risk. i bet they just p[ulled the 25 years out of their arse!
So if they win some relief, is it just for them or will any of us gain from it as well? Just curious. I have seen this in other cases and only the ones attached to the case gained from the relief.
Everyone benefits
Let’s hope they don’t try to sweep this under the rug by giving the 7 plaintiffs relief but saying it doesn’t apply to the rest of those on the registry.
What powerful and compelling stories the new plaintiffs present!
And the whole filing is amazing as usual. Thank you thank you thank you FAC
For clarification… It will help EVERYONE.
There are 5 different claims – different people can benefit from different claims.
I can’t thank you all at FAC for your tireless efforts and ongoing perseverance on behalf of those that have not had the privileged opportunity to meet you in person.
Praying daily for all FAC does.
Thank U!
Thank U!
By chance do you think this will help the Registered people for after the 2018 updates?
Then what’s the “plus” part of “Ex Post Facto Plus” refer to?
If only prior cases benefit, then it’s simply, “Ex Post Facto,” no “Plus.”
Jacob,
“Plus” refers to the other claims in the lawsuit. It’s not just Ex Post Facto.
Claim 1 is Ex Post Facto
Claim 2 is Cruel and Unusual Punishment
Claim 3 is Violation of Procedural Due Process
Claim 4 is Violation of Substantive Due Process
Claim 5 is Violation of State Right to Privacy
How does one’s go about ,entering the lawsuit, in Tennessee..which thiseffects me also.
Terrance Dupree Woods
7312254474
7316934904
Your question is off-topic for this post.
At the bottom of the complaint in the Tennessee lawsuit there should be attorneys listed (for the plaintiffs, obviously), you would need to contact them.
Our understanding is that there was a restraining order granted through disposition of the case, so you are the beneficiary of that restraining order if they are trying to remove you from your home.
Thank you to everyone fighting so hard for us. We owe you a debt we can not repay. Thank you.