CA: Fresno County to pay out in settlement over law restricting sex offender housing

Janice Bellucci can add another check to the victory column as Fresno California will be paying out an undisclosed amount in a settlement to the Alliance for Constitutional Sex Offense Laws (ACSOL) attorney who sued them over their residency restriction.

In addition to the settlement Fresno has to pay out, is the more important win – they repealed their sex offender residency restriction. Even though the state determined years ago that such laws were unconstitutional, several municipalities chose to keep the law on their books, presumably for political reasons. Apparently, they are not even currently enforcing it!

Taking that stance has cost them in the form of paying Janice’s attorneys fees, which knowing Janice will be rolled over to fund another challenge!

A side note: these residency restrictions had been declared unconstitutional by the California Supreme Court in 2015 and a 2011 management board that studied them determined they are ineffective and proximity has no correlation to re-offense. The fact that some cities have been digging in their heels despite the clear knowledge that they will get themselves sued, lose and wind up paying out tens of thousands in fees is indicative of the fact that legislators are unwilling to risk political standing despite taking action that is unconstitutional, known to be contrary to empirical data and that will cost their taxpayers money.


Discover more from Florida Action Committee

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

20 thoughts on “CA: Fresno County to pay out in settlement over law restricting sex offender housing

  • March 13, 2020

    No, Praise St. Janice!!

    Thank you so much Janice!!

    Reply
  • March 12, 2020

    Praise God!

    Reply
  • March 12, 2020

    I know this comment is not related to this post. But did anyone happen to catch the mayor down and South Florida say he wanted his actions to be guided by science and not over react about the corona virus. That’s amazing that now they want to look at facts instead of embracing hysteria.

    Reply
  • March 12, 2020

    The question remains, how soon can they sue again? Because I would repeat this over and over again.

    Reply
    • March 12, 2020

      Sue whom? The Fresno case settled.
      There are other towns being sued.

      Reply
      • March 12, 2020

        Someone reworded this, as the first wording made it out that the lawsuit would and had failed in it’s attempt to enforce the changes required, and instead simply amounted to simply forcing the state to dish out for her attorney fees.

        Reply
      • March 12, 2020

        Can she challenge Ohio’s restrictions? I volunteer to be the challenge address

        Reply

Comment Policy

  • PLEASE READ: Comments not adhering to this policy will be removed.
  • Be patient. All comments are moderated before they are published. This takes time.
  • Stay on topic. Comments and links should be relevant to this post.
  • *NEW* CLICK HERE if you have an off-topic comment or link.
  • Be respectful. Do not attack, abuse, or threaten. This includes cussing/yelling (ALL CAPS).
  • Cite. If requested, cite any bold or novel claims of fact or statistics, or your comment may be moderated.
  • *NEW* Be brief. If you have a comment of over 2,000 characters, please e-mail it to us for consideration as a member submission.
  • Reminder: Opinions and statements in comments are neither endorsed nor verified by FAC.
  • Moderation does not equal censorship. See this post for more information

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *