CA: The bill excluding violent sex offenders from elderly parole sees opposition

Senate Bill 286 (SB 286), introduced by California State Senator Brian Jones, seeks to exclude individuals convicted of violent sexual offenses and first-degree murder from eligibility under the state’s Elderly Parole Program. This program currently allows inmates aged 50 or older who have served at least 20 years to be considered for parole. The bill aims to reverse provisions established by Assembly Bill 3234 in 2020, which expanded parole eligibility during the COVID-19 pandemic.  

Opponents of SB 286, including the ACLU of California and Keith Wattley of Uncommon Law, argue that the bill is based on a sensationalized perception of risk and undermines the principles of rehabilitation. They point to California’s low recidivism rate for elderly parolees, which stands at 2.2%, as evidence that the current system effectively balances public safety with the opportunity for second chances.

Critics also highlight the financial implications of the bill, noting that incarcerating aging individuals who no longer pose a significant threat diverts resources from other critical areas. They contend that the bill disregards the potential for personal growth and change, and instead perpetuates a punitive approach that may not serve the broader interests of justice and community well-being.

For a more detailed account, you can read the full article here.


Discover more from Florida Action Committee

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

2 thoughts on “CA: The bill excluding violent sex offenders from elderly parole sees opposition

  • April 22, 2025

    So does this mean that Menendez Brothers will have to stay put?

    Reply
    • April 22, 2025

      No. It has nothing to do with their case.

      Reply

Comment Policy

  • PLEASE READ: Comments not adhering to this policy will be removed.
  • Be patient. All comments are moderated before they are published. This takes time.
  • Stay on topic. Comments and links should be relevant to this post.
  • *NEW* CLICK HERE if you have an off-topic comment or link.
  • Be respectful. Do not attack, abuse, or threaten. This includes cussing/yelling (ALL CAPS).
  • Cite. If requested, cite any bold or novel claims of fact or statistics, or your comment may be moderated.
  • *NEW* Be brief. If you have a comment of over 2,000 characters, please e-mail it to us for consideration as a member submission.
  • Reminder: Opinions and statements in comments are neither endorsed nor verified by FAC.
  • Moderation does not equal censorship. See this post for more information

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *