CALL TO ACTION #4 for HB 1085 – Moved to new committee: Infrastructure Strategies Committee

This Call To Action has been SUPERSEDED.
Comments are now disabled.

CLICK HERE FOR THE NEW CALL TO ACTION

Major Concerns About This Bill:

  • The bill states that all driver’s licenses and identification cards for people on the registry “shall have printed in the color red all information otherwise required to be printed on the front of the license or identification card.”
  • This bill has now passed two committees and is in the Infrastructure Strategies Committee.
  • Even though the court decisions for the Louisiana and Alabama cases have been sent to the analysts, it appears that the legislators are not allowing the analysts to include this information in their analyses.

  

PLEASE Do the Following:

  • Call all members of the Infrastructure Strategies Committee.
  • Whether you talk to a person or voicemail, you must give your name and contact information (phone numbers work). Remember that all voicemails are checked, so you can call after hours.
  • State that you OPPOSE the part of the bill that would require the red lettering on driver’s licenses for people on the registry.
  • Mention that you are a constituent if you happen to live in the representative’s district.
  • Give two brief reasons why you oppose the red lettering on the licenses.
  • Ask family members and friends to also call to oppose the red lettering.

 

Talking Points:

  • The U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear Louisiana’s appeal of a decision against its 2006 law requiring that people on the sex offense registry have their driver’s license or identification card marked with “SEX OFFENDER” in orange letters. The Louisiana Supreme Court said the marking was compelled speech and could not be justified by the state’s interest in protecting public safety.
  • In 2019, a federal judge struck down Alabama’s sex offense registration law that required registrants to carry a driver’s license or official ID with “CRIMINAL SEX OFFENDER” emblazoned in red.
  • If this bill is passed as is, will Florida also be facing a costly lawsuit?
  • Schools are using visitor management systems, such as Raptor, to compare a visitor’s driver’s license against a sex offense database.
  • Senator Pizzo brought up in the Infrastructure & Tourism Appropriations Subcommittee that theme parks and other places already scan the barcode on the licenses which picks up whether or not the license holder is on the registry.  His implication was that this procedure makes the red markings unnecessary.
  • There are currently 52 registry requirements for people on the sex offense registry. Every Florida legislator should have received a copy of the timeline of these registry requirements that started off with 3 in 1997 and have grown to 52 by 2020.  Failure to fulfill any of these requirements could lead up to 5 years of imprisonment, even for the thousands of Florida registrants who are now law-abiding citizens
  • While there is no research showing a need for the red lettering on licenses, there is an abundance of research showing that the sexual recidivism rate for people with a past sex offense is lower than that for all other crimes, with the exception of murder.
  • Research has shown that at 90% or more of FUTURE sex crimes will be committed by people NOT on the registry.

 

We strongly suggest you DO NOT THREATEN LAWSUITS AS THE THREATS DO NOT DETER THE LEGISLATORS.  IT DOES TEND TO ANTAGONIZE THEM AND DISMISSES THE SERIOUSNESS OF THE REST OF YOUR MESSAGE.

 

Phone Numbers for the Infrastructure Strategies Committee:

  1. Bobby Payne (Chair – R): (850) 717-5020

[email protected]

  1. Sam Garrison (Vice Chair – R): (850) 717-5011

[email protected]

  1. David Smith (Republican Committee Whip – R): (850) 717-5038

[email protected]

  1. Christine Hunschofsky (Democratic Ranking Member – D): (850) 717-5095

[email protected]

  1. Robert Andrade (R): (850) 717-5002

[email protected]

  1. Adam Botana (R): (850) 717-5080

[email protected]

  1. Robert Brackett (R): (850) 717-5034

[email protected]

  1. James Buchanan (R): (850) 717-5074

[email protected]

  1. Hillary Cassel (D): (850) 717-5101

[email protected]

  1. Linda Chaney (R): (850) 717-5061

[email protected]

  1. Anna Eskamani (D): (850) 717-5042

[email protected]

  1. Tom Fabricio (R): (850) 717-5110

[email protected]

  1. Michael Gottlieb (D): (850) 717-5102

[email protected]

  1. Sam Killebrew (R): (850) 717-5048

[email protected]

  1. Johanna Lopez (D): (850) 717-5043

[email protected]

  1. Fiona McFarland (R): (850) 717-5073

[email protected]

  1. James Mooney, Jr. (R): (850) 717-5120

[email protected]

  1. Angela Nixon (D): (850) 717-5013

[email protected]

  1. Susan Plasencia (R): (850) 717-5037

[email protected]

  1. Felicia Robinson (D): (850) 717-5104

[email protected]

  1. Jason Shoaf (R): (850) 717-5007

[email protected]

  1. Cyndi Stevenson (R): (850) 717-5018

[email protected]

  1. Josie Tomkow (R): (850) 717-5051

[email protected]

  1. Keith Truenow (R): (850) 717-5026

[email protected]

 

Every call gets heard and tallied.  Every respectful conversation with a staffer is an excellent opportunity to change a mind about our community with someone who has direct contact with a lawmaker.  YOUR EFFORTS DO MAKE A DIFFERENCE!

This Call To Action has been SUPERSEDED.
Comments are now disabled.

CLICK HERE FOR THE NEW CALL TO ACTION


Discover more from Florida Action Committee

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

35 thoughts on “CALL TO ACTION #4 for HB 1085 – Moved to new committee: Infrastructure Strategies Committee

  • March 29, 2023

    This does not surprises me. I try to optimistic, but, being as human as I am, I commented to my wife that in the past (before I met her) I thought it was better be dead than going through all the crap, stupid requirements and awful and constant stigmatization we live day by day.

    To be clear…I don’t think like that anymore.

  • March 28, 2023

    Time to start looking for a lawyer to assist with an injunction.

    • March 29, 2023

      I have already pledged $100. RI had its 1000 foot rule enjoined for over 8 years before the court found in favor or the registrant so if they can do it so can we

    • April 2, 2023

      I agree.

  • March 28, 2023

    Only 7 democrats on the committee. Now I know how the Spartans felt facing the entire Persian army.

    • March 30, 2023

      Rick, do you know how everyone on the committee voted, both Republicans and Democrats? Is this published somewhere? I’ve seen members of both parties harm us.

  • March 28, 2023

    Are we preparing to ask the courts for an injunction, then preparing to litigate unconstitutionality? I mean really, we live in the USA. Not Russia, Germany, or some other place. What’s next? Will we have to wear the star of David on our lapels?

    • March 29, 2023

      Richard
      I would proudly wear the star of David even though I am not Jewish.

      We will get a star of shame. Not a star on Hollywood Blvd. Not a star named after us. We won’t become a movie star. Maybe the mark of the beast? We are supposed to reject that mark. I mean come on, the mark on the license is red just like Satan’s jumpsuit.

  • March 28, 2023

    Yes, they will get lots of calls against this bill. Why do they ignore them?

    They say they “received lots of calls on this bill” but do not say they were all against the bill, making it seemingly that the calls favored the bill.

    I listened to the house committee and every one of them just said “my office has received lot of calls on this”, but did not say every single call was against the bill….

  • March 28, 2023

    At what point does the Supreme court finally step in and say “Enough is enough”? If this passes, (And it seems it will) the possibilities are limitless.
    Bumper stickers on our cars bumpers stating we are on the registry.
    Having to tell our doctors offices we are a registrant.
    Having special hours we are allowed to shop anywhere where the public is present.
    Not being allowed in public restrooms.
    Have other forms of I.D marked like our credit cards, our insurance cards, etc.
    And to fight it if it passes could take years. And someone please tell me why this does not teeter on compelled speech?

    • March 29, 2023

      Jack I pledge 100$ heck $150 toward an injunction. And it is compelled speech. It is illegal under due process as well as the equal protection clause. Bank robbers do not have a marking that a bank teller could see!!! I have already told my wife this is my Alamo if this passes I’ll be looking at filing an injunction and or moving out of state which is sad been in the same house since 2003. Great neighbors never any issues and have raised 3 daughters here but as I said This is my ALAMO

      • March 30, 2023

        If the bill is passed and the deadline to get the new license is July 1st. How many days can we go before July 1st to get the new license? Can we go as soon as the bill is passed? Do we only get two days before July 1st. What is the protocol on that?

        • March 30, 2023

          Great questions, Jennifer. Do they have to notify us or is this a strict liability law where theres no defense to not knowing and not complying?

      • April 2, 2023

        Great. Need more people like you to financially support. I’ve contributed $2,800 to FAC Legal fund.

Comments are closed.

Comment Policy

  • PLEASE READ: Comments not adhering to this policy will be removed.
  • Be patient. All comments are moderated before they are published. This takes time.
  • Stay on topic. Comments and links should be relevant to this post.
  • *NEW* CLICK HERE if you have an off-topic comment or link.
  • Be respectful. Do not attack, abuse, or threaten. This includes cussing/yelling (ALL CAPS).
  • Cite. If requested, cite any bold or novel claims of fact or statistics, or your comment may be moderated.
  • *NEW* Be brief. If you have a comment of over 2,000 characters, please e-mail it to us for consideration as a member submission.
  • Reminder: Opinions and statements in comments are neither endorsed nor verified by FAC.
  • Moderation does not equal censorship. See this post for more information