CT: EyeDetect and polygraph exams

The Judicial Branch Court Support Services Division (JBCSSD) of the State of Connecticut recently released public information indicating the EyeDetect lie detection technology is now being used for assessment and testing by Adult Sex Offender Services on a multi-year plan beginning Jan. 1, 2021. The contract calls for the state to administer 2,300 EyeDetect and polygraph exams annually.

One Converus Service Partner based in Jacksonville, Florida, Dr. George Deitchman, an expert who has evaluated and treated sex offenders for 30+ years, a polygraph examiner since 2009 and an expert and trainer in the use of EyeDetect, has successfully used EyeDetect to test sex offenders in Florida since 2017.

“I’ve used EyeDetect with a number of clients to test for specific and maintenance issues, as well as sexual histories,” said Deitchman. “While traditionally we’ve used polygraph testing, the use of a pupillometry technology like EyeDetect — and its ability to measure subject physiological responses to test questions in an entirely different way — is helpful for some clients with extraneous movement or other testing issues. In addition, EyeDetect’s automation achieves similar or better results than other methods that require an examiner to do the testing and scoring.”

SOURCE


Discover more from Florida Action Committee

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

16 thoughts on “CT: EyeDetect and polygraph exams

  • July 26, 2021

    I have Aspergers, a high functioning form of Autism, so if they used this on me it would drive me crazy due to sensitivity to light. My body, my choice and I don’t want their junk science anywhere near my front/back yards. Instead of using cons to get people arrested, why not put the cons in the constitution. Anyway to make a buck while ethics be damned.

    Reply
  • July 25, 2021

    Georgia Attaches it to ones penis, no coeds allowed

    Reply
    • July 26, 2021

      I am sure that method is accurate and definitive for determining risk. Am I correct to presume that a man who has an erection upon seeing porn or nudity is deemed more likely to offend. What about those individuals with erectile dysfunction issues?

      Reply
  • July 25, 2021

    Talk about putting the “con” in CONnecticut! Next month they’ll be using tea leaf reading and Ouija boards.

    Reply
  • July 25, 2021

    I left a comment on that page about how EyeDetect is essentially the same as a polygraph, just recording a different but equally meaningless body function subject to interpretation. It has since been deleted. Interesting.

    Reply
  • July 25, 2021

    I do not know about the eye test thingy but I can tell you polygraphs are NOT accurate. I have taken over 40 polygraphs in my life (you have to take one for every law enforcement agency you apply for).

    In once instance I was asked if I ever used cocaine. I had never even seen cocaine other than in movies. Didn’t get the job failed test. The next agency I was asked about marijuana usage. I said yes , I failed the test.

    The next agency asked about marijuana usage, I said no(I had used it when I was younger) I passed.

    It all depends on how nervous you are, if you are someone who always carries guilt around, if you are a hardened jerk with no emotions etc. Also If you have heart issues, a nervous tic, breathing problems and so on.

    To base someone’s future on a polygraph result is paramount to insanity.

    Reply
    • July 27, 2021

      It depends more on the administrator. Polygraph results are predetermined more often than not.

      Reply
      • July 27, 2021

        And yet it is still inadmissable in Courts, go figure!!

        Reply
        • July 27, 2021

          Sc

          Seems to me if you pass they do not want to bring it up. However if you fail, some prosecutors will sneak it into the conversation and then have it struck from the record. However, the jury cannot just erase what they heard from their memory drive.

          Just odd that when I was a cop, everyone seemed to either catch a break on sentencing or get out of the charges completely. Then the one time I was accused of something, I somehow got the judge who sentenced Charles Manson.

          Reply
  • July 25, 2021

    Not mandated by statute. Refuse unless of course you are on probation because that will get you to jail.

    Reply
    • July 25, 2021

      Refusal won’t necessarily get you tossed in jail because anyone can claim the Fifth at anytime. See US v. Von Behren, 822 F.3d 1139 (10th Cir. 2016)

      Reply
      • July 26, 2021

        because anyone can claim the Fifth at anytime. Except registraints.

        Reply

Comment Policy

  • PLEASE READ: Comments not adhering to this policy will be removed.
  • Be patient. All comments are moderated before they are published. This takes time.
  • Stay on topic. Comments and links should be relevant to this post.
  • *NEW* CLICK HERE if you have an off-topic comment or link.
  • Be respectful. Do not attack, abuse, or threaten. This includes cussing/yelling (ALL CAPS).
  • Cite. If requested, cite any bold or novel claims of fact or statistics, or your comment may be moderated.
  • *NEW* Be brief. If you have a comment of over 2,000 characters, please e-mail it to us for consideration as a member submission.
  • Reminder: Opinions and statements in comments are neither endorsed nor verified by FAC.
  • Moderation does not equal censorship. See this post for more information

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *