Death penalty on the table for first time child sex crime offenders

Oklahoma’s law against child sex predators just got tougher. Governor Stitt signed Senate Bill 599, so now, if anyone’s found guilty of committing lewd acts with a child under 14, they could face the death penalty or life in prison without parole.

SOURCE


Discover more from Florida Action Committee

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

36 thoughts on “Death penalty on the table for first time child sex crime offenders

  • May 28, 2025

    Please bring 🙏 it to Florida, keep our children safe.

    Reply
    • May 28, 2025

      Instead of focusing on capital punishment, society should focus on the need for expanding prevention programs, increasing support for survivors, and ensuring fair sentencing that balances accountability with the possibility of rehabilitation.
      These alternatives can address the root causes of sexual abuse while upholding justice and human dignity.

      Reply
  • May 27, 2025

    The problem with being charged with any sex crime against a child… you are guilty until you prove yourself innocent. Hard standard to fight against. Often convictions are based on allegations without ANY physical evidence.

    Reply
    • May 28, 2025

      If a jury finds you guilty and you go to prison then there’s nothing to fight. The jury has spoken and you guilty af.

      Reply
      • May 28, 2025

        Lots of innocent people have been sent to prison.

        Reply
  • May 27, 2025

    Oklahoma’s Senate Bill 599 may sound tough on paper, but it’s likely unconstitutional. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Kennedy v. Louisiana (2008) that the death penalty for crimes against individuals—when the victim does not die—violates the Eighth Amendment’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment. This includes child sexual abuse. The Court made clear that capital punishment must be proportional to the crime, and unless it results in death, the death penalty crosses that constitutional line.

    This law will almost certainly be challenged and struck down, wasting taxpayer resources and retraumatizing victims during appeals. Being tough on crime doesn’t mean ignoring the Constitution.

    Reply
    • June 3, 2025

      That is what we all thought in Roe vs Wade, and look how sideways that went.

      Reply
  • May 27, 2025

    How long until this makes it to Florida and they make it retroactive? I figured eventually they’d tell me to report to prison because they changed the laws, but hey let’s skip that and just put is to death…30+ years later.

    Reply
  • May 27, 2025

    Even though they don’t specify which lewd acts, it’s still ridiculous where this country is headed. The punishments just keep intensifying, with almost no end. They’re pushing the limits, to see how far they can go with the laws in states. Eventually there could be a death penalty for almost any crime. Dystopian future slowly creeping in.

    Reply
    • May 28, 2025

      Tereto
      Lewd act is a CRIME( no specification needed) period……

      Reply
      • May 28, 2025

        While the term “lewd” can be broad (e.g., “sexual in an offensive way”), legal definitions often include specific actions or situations. For example, in North Carolina, “lewd conduct” can refer to taking indecent liberties with a child, which involves specific actions on or with a child’s body. Legal definitions of “lewd” and “lewd conduct” can vary significantly by state, so it’s crucial to consult the specific laws of the jurisdiction in question.

        Reply
        • May 28, 2025

          bwj
          In Florida, a “lewd or lascivious act” is defined as an act that is sexually explicit or offensive, particularly when involving a minor. So were concern about Florida in particular

          Reply
          • May 28, 2025

            Rita
            So I too am concerned with Florida. My point was to illustrate that there are differences in the law. My charge was in Florida twelve years ago. I moved to North Carolina in a couple of years I will be able to get off of the registry.

            Reply
    • May 28, 2025

      G
      It appears that Oklahoma is waiting for a challenge to SCOTUS.

      Reply

Comment Policy

  • PLEASE READ: Comments not adhering to this policy will be removed.
  • Be patient. All comments are moderated before they are published. This takes time.
  • Stay on topic. Comments and links should be relevant to this post.
  • *NEW* CLICK HERE if you have an off-topic comment or link.
  • Be respectful. Do not attack, abuse, or threaten. This includes cussing/yelling (ALL CAPS).
  • Cite. If requested, cite any bold or novel claims of fact or statistics, or your comment may be moderated.
  • *NEW* Be brief. If you have a comment of over 2,000 characters, please e-mail it to us for consideration as a member submission.
  • Reminder: Opinions and statements in comments are neither endorsed nor verified by FAC.
  • Moderation does not equal censorship. See this post for more information

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *