Group says sex offender ordinance violates civil rights
The following aired on WFTV News last night.
Discover more from Florida Action Committee
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
2 thoughts on “Group says sex offender ordinance violates civil rights”
Comment Policy
- PLEASE READ: Comments not adhering to this policy will be removed.
- Be patient. All comments are moderated before they are published. This takes time.
- Stay on topic. Comments and links should be relevant to this post.
- *NEW* CLICK HERE if you have an off-topic comment or link.
- Be respectful. Do not attack, abuse, or threaten. This includes cussing/yelling (ALL CAPS).
- Cite. If requested, cite any bold or novel claims of fact or statistics, or your comment may be moderated.
- *NEW* Be brief. If you have a comment of over 2,000 characters, please e-mail it to us for consideration as a member submission.
- Reminder: Opinions and statements in comments are neither endorsed nor verified by FAC.
- Moderation does not equal censorship. See this post for more information
The reporter does seem very biased in his tone and manner. What needs to be addressed, in this whole thing that is beginning to resemble a Gordian Knot, is it even LEGAL to state that an s.o. cannot conduct business within that 1200, 1500, or 1000-foot zone?
Crazy thing, seems that the reporter(s) expressed that this suit was justifiable, which it is. However, the very first comment of the airing already had viewers defensive and negative with listening to the rest with an open mind.