How will the Epstein case change New Mexico’s registration laws?

As soon as I saw the headline, I started to worry for New Mexico. The New York Times last week ran a story with the headline, “Jeffrey Epstein Registered as a Sex Offender in 2 States. In New Mexico He Didn’t Have to.” and I immediately thought to myself, ‘OH NO!’ How long will it be until the State of New Mexico proposes a new law (possibly named after one of the victims in the Epstein case) to close this perceived “loophole” in their registry?

I didn’t have to wait long for my answer or the proposal. On Friday of the same week, New Mexico’s attorney general, Hector Balderas, announced he wants to change a law that allowed billionaire businessman Jeffrey Epstein to avoid registering as a sex offender in the state.

Legislators need to stop doing this! Waiting for an extremely rare, headline grabbing occurrence to happen and then coming up with knee-jerk legislation to serve as a “fix”, that does nothing to fix any perceived problem and that will have no impact on Epstein but will undoubtedly punish people who have nothing to do with him. We’ve seen it happen time and time again.

After the murder of Jessica Lunsford, States across the country passed “Jessica Lunsford Acts” imposing harsh punishments for a horrific act committed by John Couey, who was never subjected to any of the Jessica Lunsford Acts and will never be. Similarly, Jesse Timmendequas, who raped and killed Megan Kanka, will never be subjected to “Megan’s Law” because he’s serving a life sentence in New Jersey. The year after the murder of Cherish Perrywinkle, Florida passed a bunch of new restrictions for persons required to register as sex offenders, making it “scorched earth”, but the target of that punishment, Donald Smith, will never experience the scorched earth because he’ll be in prison for the rest of his life, while tens of thousands of first-time, non-violent offenders are serving his punishment.

Assuming the government is now going to hand Epstein the punishment they believe he should have gotten more than a decade ago, he may never be returning to New Mexico. Still, presuming he does; his “Zorro Ranch” in New Mexico sits on thousands of acres of land and even has it’s own airstrip and airplane hangar. Do you really think the burdens of registration (like ostracism, vigilantism, finding employment and a place to live) are going to impact him? Hell no! Who will it impact? The potentially thousands of hard-working people who have paid their debt to society, redeemed themselves and are now living a law abiding life, who may decades later have to retroactively be added to the New Mexico registry and will lose their jobs, homes and families.

 


Discover more from Florida Action Committee

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

40 thoughts on “How will the Epstein case change New Mexico’s registration laws?

  • February 11, 2020

    FAC, when someone communicates a threat of violence on this website, it is your duty to report that threat to law enforcement.

    Reply
    • February 11, 2020

      If there is a credible threat against an identifiable potential victim, it will certainly be reported.
      If some vigilante wants to come in here in and start spewing garbage, we have an opportunity to respond with facts and statistics.

      Reply
      • February 12, 2020

        I see. So this is not credible:

        “Lucky ypu dodnt fuck with anybody in my clan. Youd be resting in a concrete footer for eternity.”

        Reply
      • February 13, 2020

        I might only question…if such a comment was sent to a school, politician’s office, police station, business, etc. would it be considered credible?

        Reply
        • February 13, 2020

          If anyone feels the comment made by Clark is credible and directed at them and would like to file a police report, please contact legal@floridaactioncommittee.org and will will provide the IP address of the individual making the comment.

          Reply
          • February 13, 2020

            That same comment could be made about any threat sent to anyone. Credible or not, it is still a threat. Who knows whether any threat is credible for sure unless it is carried out, and then it is too late to determine credibility. Schools are shut down for threats that are much less threatening. Credibility is not considered.

          • February 13, 2020

            Well said, Captain!

  • July 16, 2019

    Further reports coming out of Santa Fe have offered more clarification on this issue. In short the law read in Florida, “….persons under 18.” In New Mexico it reads, “…persons under 16” in regards to sex trafficking. According to the police report available to New Mexico authorities applicable to his “sealed” plea deal, the victim’s age was 17 therefore he was not required to register. So I don’t think this will spark a huge backlash of new laws. I’m in New Mexico, so i’ve researched this pretty well. This article from the Santa Fe Reporter finally set it all straight. https://www.sfreporter.com/news/2019/07/10/epstein-absent-from-sex-offender-list/

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *