Judge Denies Injunction at Miami-Dade encampment

We just got word that the Judge denied the plaintiff’s request for an emergency injunction.

The news is disappointing, but not surprising.

The plaintiffs were hoping the judge would enjoin the enforcement of the Bovo amendment, preventing the 270+ individuals homeless at the encampment in Hialeah from being arrested. He did not.

Attorneys are evaluating next steps. In the mean time, where these 270+ individuals will sleep tonight remains an unknown. We will just have to see where the next encampment pops up.


Discover more from Florida Action Committee

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

35 thoughts on “Judge Denies Injunction at Miami-Dade encampment

  • May 12, 2018

    You can bet this so-called Judge is on Rahn “the nanny” Crook’s donation list.

    Reply
    • May 13, 2018

      He was.
      He received $1000 from Book, though I doubt $1000 swayed his decision.

      Reply
      • May 13, 2018

        $1000.00 is a good payday for one word, DENIED. Probably with the promise of re-election and more campaign contributions. I just knew Teflon ron had his grubby little fingers in the pie.

        Reply
        • May 13, 2018

          I think the judge realized that the problem would not be fixed (until/unless) the Executive Branch=Dick Scott and the Legislative Branch=Florida Politicians in the House and Senate stopped making bad laws and policies against our community.

          The judge also saw the encampment as a heath hazard.

          While I would not ever claim that the judge would not consider his political career in this decision, I can (and do) see his point of view from a judicial stance.

          Reply
          • May 14, 2018

            M – Respectfully, I do not agree – there is plenty the judge could do. He could find the living restriction unconstitutional – he could have ordered the county to find a decent place for these people to live – remember these folks were told to go there by POs and LEs because there was no where else to go. Other judges have done similar things. No, there was plenty the judge could have done.

            Reply
            • May 14, 2018

              It’s ok that you disagree. I just happen to know the limits a judge has on legislating from the bench. I also reiterated why the judge gave his decision the way he did.

              I do think that he could have granted the injunction, but it would not have solved much other than to delay the Bovo Amendment which was being pushed by (insane man) Ron Book. What needs to happen is the Florida legislature needs to stop making bad, unconstitutional laws. That fight needs to happen in the Federal courts where a person’s political career does not come into question.

              Reply
  • May 12, 2018

    Well, maybe they can go camp in the judges back yard – what an A@@

    Reply

Comment Policy

  • PLEASE READ: Comments not adhering to this policy will be removed.
  • Be patient. All comments are moderated before they are published. This takes time.
  • Stay on topic. Comments and links should be relevant to this post.
  • *NEW* CLICK HERE if you have an off-topic comment or link.
  • Be respectful. Do not attack, abuse, or threaten. This includes cussing/yelling (ALL CAPS).
  • Cite. If requested, cite any bold or novel claims of fact or statistics, or your comment may be moderated.
  • *NEW* Be brief. If you have a comment of over 2,000 characters, please e-mail it to us for consideration as a member submission.
  • Reminder: Opinions and statements in comments are neither endorsed nor verified by FAC.
  • Moderation does not equal censorship. See this post for more information

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *