Little known laws: Florida Statute 794.075 – Sexual predators; erectile dysfunction drugs

Here’s something that’s apparently been on the books for a while but we were not aware of:

(1) A person may not possess a prescription drug, as defined in s. 499.003(40), for the purpose of treating erectile dysfunction if the person is designated as a sexual predator under s. 775.21.
(2) A person who violates a provision of this section for the first time commits a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083. A person who violates a provision of this section a second or subsequent time commits a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.

Should the legislature dictate which prescription medications someone can take?


Discover more from Florida Action Committee

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

32 thoughts on “Little known laws: Florida Statute 794.075 – Sexual predators; erectile dysfunction drugs

  • June 11, 2025

    How do you justify statement, dr.?

    Reply
    • June 12, 2025

      bwj
      ask doctor?

      Reply
  • June 11, 2025

    A legally married offender is not allowed medical treatment afforded other married couples. The “medication” is allowed all “Americans” by the FDA.

    Reply
    • June 11, 2025

      Sex offenders shouldnt be allowed to use Viagra… Catnip will do wonders

      Reply
    • June 11, 2025

      richard
      Legally is the KEY question?

      Reply
      • June 11, 2025

        What does that mean d? “Legally is the KEY question.”

        Reply
  • June 10, 2025

    According to several articles, there is little evidence showing that treating sexual dysfunction in registrants increases or decreases their risk of reoffending. Some research suggests that treating sexual dysfunction in offenders where offending is driven by non-sexual factors may not increase recidivism risk. Restricting access to essential healthcare for sex offenders raises constitutional and ethical questions, including claims of interference with fundamental liberties and cruel and unusual punishment.

    Reply
  • June 10, 2025

    I agree with no funny stuff after release. This qualifies as funny stuff. Good statute!

    Reply
  • June 9, 2025

    I’m not surprised. The government tries to tell women that have not broken any laws (maybr questionable morals maybe, in some circumstances) but have not broken any laws, what they can and cannot do with their own bodies as well.

    It’s funny to see all the opposition we get on this forum. Self righteous and judgemental, never once understanding that a lot of us made a one time mistake. A lack of judgment and poor decision on our part. Not knowing what happened to us as children etc. They get on here with a “control/punish” mentality. Never once coming up with a solution or preventative measure to stop sex offense from happening in the first place. Obviously the registry stops people from committing sex crimes (sarcasm). Some are on the registry just for indecent exposure/public urination. Probably drunk or unaware of their surroundings etc landing them on a life long punishment of the registry in Florida.

    But go off and state your immature and ignorant comments. One thing about solutions is to understand why or how something happened. Not being closed-minded and Judgemental.

    Reply
  • June 9, 2025

    I doubt this would stand up in court.

    Reply
    • June 11, 2025

      As far as I can tell from thoroughly researching Florida appellate court decisions, no person has ever been convicted of this crime in the State of Florida. It’s possible no person has even ever be charged with it. It is almost certainly unconstitutional.

      Reply

Comment Policy

  • PLEASE READ: Comments not adhering to this policy will be removed.
  • Be patient. All comments are moderated before they are published. This takes time.
  • Stay on topic. Comments and links should be relevant to this post.
  • *NEW* CLICK HERE if you have an off-topic comment or link.
  • Be respectful. Do not attack, abuse, or threaten. This includes cussing/yelling (ALL CAPS).
  • Cite. If requested, cite any bold or novel claims of fact or statistics, or your comment may be moderated.
  • *NEW* Be brief. If you have a comment of over 2,000 characters, please e-mail it to us for consideration as a member submission.
  • Reminder: Opinions and statements in comments are neither endorsed nor verified by FAC.
  • Moderation does not equal censorship. See this post for more information

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *